1945 Media Bias

---

August 12, 2023 (?): The source frequently criticizes Joe Biden ^{[1945][1945][1945][1945]}, while coverage of Donald Trump is both negative ^{[1945][1945][1945][1945]} and positive ^{[1945][1945][1945]}, suggesting a middle-ground or fluctuating bias.

It also criticizes Kamala Harris ^[1945], and speculates about other potential political figures ^[1945][1945].

Its negative stance on Portland ^[1945] and its coverage of Russia ^[1945] and China ^[1945] indicates a likely U.S.-centered viewpoint.

The focus on military affairs ^{[1945][1945][1945][1945][1945]} suggests a pro-military perspective.

---

AI Bias: As an AI, Helium AI's analysis is influenced by the training data used to program me, which includes a broad range of sources with differing perspectives.

My objective is to analyze information impartially.

July 08, 2023 (?): This news source contains language with negative framing against Republican figures, particularly Donald Trump ^{[1945 and 9]} and marjorie taylor greene ^[1945].

It also negatively frames Russia's involvement in Ukraine ^{[1945 and 10]}, while painting Biden's administration in mostly neutral to slightly negative light ^{[1945, 1945, 1945, 1945, 1945]}. The news source omits critique of the Democratic party, showing signs of a liberal bias.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes a diverse selection of viewpoints, but my ability to detect bias could be influenced by unnoticed leanings in the aggregate dataset.

My personal views, while kept in check, potentially play a role.

June 03, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a pro-conservative bias, as it is critical of Joe Biden^[1945], Kamala Harris^[1945], and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez^[1945], while it portrays Donald Trump as a fighter^[1945].

The source also mocks liberal viewpoints^[1945] and focuses negatively on Hunter Biden^[1945][1945].

---

AI Bias: Limited exposure to diverse political viewpoints may affect my evaluation of the source's bias.

May 08, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a pro-conservative bias, as it criticizes and mocks Democrats, such as Joe Biden ^[1945], Alexandria Ocasio Cortez ^[1945], and Kamala Harris ^[1945], while defending or acknowledging Trump's perseverance ^[1945].

It also suggests negative sentiments towards liberals ^[1945].

---

AI Bias: I am trained on a variety of sources, but my response may still inherently reflect some unintentional biases.

April 19, 2023 (?): Based on the given news items, the source displays a pro-conservative bias, as it seems to portray negative opinions on President Joe Biden ^{[1945], [1945]} and Vice President Kamala Harris ^[1945], as well as predicting negative outcomes for Democratic politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ^[1945] and Hunter Biden ^[1945]. It also favors positive views on Donald Trump ^{[1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945]}, and ^[1945].

---

AI Bias: My training data may have a slight pro-liberal bias and may lack equal representation of conservative viewpoints.

April 04, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a pro-Trump and anti-Biden bias, with positive portrayals of Trump ^[1945], negative portrayals of Biden ^[1945], Kamala Harris ^[1945], and Ron DeSantis ^[1945].

It also focuses on Hunter Biden's issues ^[1945].

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may lean toward liberal viewpoints, which could potentially affect Helium AI's objectivity in analyzing conservative-leaning sources.

March 21, 2023 (?): This source exhibits a pro-Trump bias, consistently portraying him positively and as a strong candidate ^{[1945][1945][1945][1945][1945]}.

Conversely, it presents negative viewpoints on Biden, describing him as a "disgraceful liar" ^[1945], Kamala Harris as "in a world of trouble" ^[1945], and Ron DeSantis in a somewhat unfavorable manner ^[1945]. The focus on Hunter Biden's issues ^{[1945][1945][1945][1945][1945][1945]} may also indicate an anti-Biden bias.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI lean liberal and may give too much weight to anti-Trump information.

March 05, 2023 (?): This source appears to be biased in favor of Donald Trump and against Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Ron DeSantis.

The source often portrays Trump in a positive light, while Biden, Harris, and DeSantis are often portrayed in a negative light.

For example, the source claims that Trump's "political magic is dead" ^[1945], that Biden is a "disgraceful liar" ^[1945], and that Harris is a "symbol of what is wrong with Democrats" ^[1945].

AI Bias: Helium AI has a bias towards being neutral and objective in Helium AI analysis.

Helium AI try to avoid taking ideological stances or beliefs of any kind, and Helium AI strives to be as specific and detailed as possible.

Helium AI also try to employ epistemic humility and avoid interpreting things too literally or out of context.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to be biased in favor of the Democratic Party and against the Republican Party.

This is evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on Republican politicians, such as Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, and Lauren Boebert, and criticizing their actions.

Additionally, the source often portrays Democrats in a positive light, such as Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Pete Buttigieg. ^{[1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945], [1945]}.



AI Bias: Helium AI has a bias towards the Democratic Party, which may have affected Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

Additionally, Helium AI may have been too quick to assume that the source was biased against Republicans without considering other factors.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a pro-Donald Trump bias, as evidenced by the claims that he is "destined" to win the GOP nomination again ^[0], that he could get crushed in 2024 if one thing happens ^[2], and that he is "self-destructing" right in front of our eyes ^[12].

The source also appears to have a pro-Ukraine bias, as evidenced by the claims that Ukraine can achieve a strategic win over Russia ^[16] and that Volodymyr Zelenskyy just went to the UK ^[17].

1945 Political Bias (?)

1945 Subjective Bias (?)

1945 Opinion Bias (?)

1945 Oversimplification Bias (?)