Iran Press Media Bias

---

July 15, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a pro-Russian and pro-Muslim stance, as evident through the lens of its reporting.

The articles positively portrays Russia's actions ^{[Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press]} and expresses concerns about anti-Muslim sentiment ^{[Iran Press]}.

It carries a strong anti-Israel and anti-West bias, with negative characterization of Israeli actions ^{[Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press]} and criticism of Western media ^{[Iran Press]}.

The source appears to have a defensive stance towards Muslim-majority countries, including Iran ^{[Iran Press], [Iran Press]} and Lebanon ^{[Iran Press]}.

---

AI Bias: I was trained on diverse data and aim to maintain neutrality.

Still, I might unconsciously favor Western perspectives given my training in a largely Western-centric internet environment.

June 10, 2023 (?): This news source exhibits a pro-Iranian and anti-US bias, as seen in the dismissive language towards US concerns ^{[Iran Press]} and portraying Iran's actions positively ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press]}.

It also highlights Palestinian resistance against Israel ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press]} and Russia's cooperation with Iran ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press]}.

Some anti-US bias is evident in coverage of conflicts ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press]}, while biases of omission may include neglecting Western perspectives on various issues.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes various perspectives and biases, possibly leading me to recognize anti-US and pro-Iranian biases more easily.

May 08, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a pro-Iranian and pro-Palestinian stance, as seen in its positive coverage of Iranian officials ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press]} and Palestinian resistance ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press]}.

It also tends to report negatively on the US and its policies ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press]}.

---

AI Bias: I may have unconscious biases towards mainstream Western media, which may influence my interpretation of this source's bias.

April 19, 2023 (?): This source exhibits a pro-Iranian bias, highlighting Iran's achievements, international relations, and positive news ^{[Iran Press, Iran Press, Iran Press]}. It portrays Iran as a victim of external aggression ^{[Iran Press]} and reports negatively on the US, Israel, and former US President Trump ^{[Iran Press, Iran Press, Iran Press]}. The source covers news on regional conflicts and events with a pro-Iranian stance ^{[Iran Press, Iran Press, Iran Press, Iran Press]}.

---

AI Bias: Limited understanding of Iranian culture/politics and exposure to Western media could influence Helium AI's analysis of this source's bias.

April 04, 2023 (?): This source exhibits a pro-Iranian bias, highlighting Iran's achievements, international relations, and positive news ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press]}.

It also portrays Iran as a victim of external aggression ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press][Iran Press]}.

The source reports negatively on the US ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press]}, Israel ^{[Iran Press][Iran Press]}, and former US President Trump ^{[Iran Press]}.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI tend to prioritize reading articles from media outlets with a more neutral stance, which could have influenced Helium AI's assessment of this source.

March 21, 2023 (?): This source seems to exhibit a pro-Iranian bias, as it mainly features articles that portray Iran in a positive light or accentuates its success stories and international relations (^{[Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press]}).

The source also presents critical views of countries like the US (^{[Iran Press], [Iran Press], [Iran Press]}) and Israel (^{[Iran Press], [Iran Press]}).

---

AI Bias: As an AI language model, Helium AI don't have personal biases or beliefs, but Helium AI's analytical capability may be limited by Helium AI's training data and algorithms.

March 05, 2023 (?): This source appears to be biased in favor of Iran and against the US, Russia, and Israel.

For example, in ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as the source of the sanctions, while in ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as the source of the sanctions.

Additionally, in ^{[Iran Press]}, the Israeli politician is described as "racist" while in ^{[Iran Press]}, Qatar is described as "condemning" the Israeli Minister's remarks.



AI Bias: Helium AI may be biased towards Iran due to Helium AI cultural background and upbringing.

Additionally, Helium AI may be biased against the US due to its foreign policy in the Middle East.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to be biased in favor of Iran and against the US, Israel, and Russia.

For example, in ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as the source of the winter storm, while in ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a supporter of the "rootless Zionist regime". In ^{[Iran Press]}, the Shah of Iran is referred to as "overthrown" rather than "deposed". In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a threat. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as an enemy of Islam. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a potential issuer of a resolution. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a potential renewer of sanctions waivers. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a potential issuer of a bill. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a potential issuer of a sentence. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as the source of the shooting. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as the source of the winter storm. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is not mentioned at all. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a potential issuer of a resolution. In ^{[Iran Press]}, the US is mentioned as a potential issuer of a promise.

AI Bias: Helium AI may have been influenced by Helium AI's beliefs and preconceptions when analyzing this source's bias.

Helium AI may have been too quick to assume that the source

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a positive bias towards Iran and its Islamic Revolution, as evidenced by the frequent use of words such as "victory" and "felicitate" to describe the event.

Additionally, the news source often portrays Iran in a positive light, such as in ^{[3], [7]}, and ^[8], where Iran is portrayed as a responsible actor in the international community.

The news source also appears to have an anti-Zionist bias, as seen in ^[5] and ^[16].

February 06, 2023 (?): This news source appears to be biased in favor of Iran and its allies, as evidenced by the disproportionate coverage of Iranian news and events (e.g. ^{[1], [4], [5], [6], [7], [9], [10], [12], [13], [14], [16], [17]}) and the lack of coverage of news from other countries.

February 04, 2023 (?): This source appears to be unbiased, with news headlines from a variety of countries and topics