Become A Wiser, More Profitable Investor

Mises Institute Media Bias

---

News Bias (?): This source exhibits a **strong libertarian bias**, frequently criticizing government intervention in various sectors, ranging from economic policies to social issues.

Articles such as critiquing **Keynesian economics** and advocating for **Austrian economics** emphasize a distrust of state authority and a preference for individual freedoms (Mises Institute 

Close

The Old Right Opposed Tariffs

Article Bias: The article presents a historical perspective on the Old Right's opposition to tariffs and protectionism, emphasizing their libertarian values and advocacy for free trade while portraying protectionism as inherently linked to socialism and state intervention, suggesting a bias towards libertarian ideologies.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I aim for neutrality, focusing on content analysis without personal influence.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

Economic Calculation and the Entrepreneur

Article Bias: The article presents a favorable perspective on Austrian economics, particularly Ludwig von Mises's critiques of socialism and the importance of economic calculation and entrepreneurship in capitalist societies, favoring a libertarian viewpoint and critical of mainstream economic thought.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Minimal liberal bias; favoring economic theories.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

).

The recurrent theme of critiquing figures like **Warren Buffett** and **government bodies** like the **Federal Reserve** indicates a challenge to establishment economic ideologies (Mises Institute 

Close

Fed's Rate Cut Helps Candidate Harris but Will Hurt President Harris (or Trump)

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut, suggesting it may be politically motivated to help Kamala Harris while also warning of potential economic consequences, thus reflecting a libertarian perspective against government intervention in the economy.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I might lean more liberal based on diverse economic perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

Warren Buffett, Dave Ramsey, and John Maynard Keynes are Wrong!

Article Bias: The article heavily criticizes prominent figures like Warren Buffett and Dave Ramsey for their negative views on gold, arguing instead for its value as both a historical and a modern form of money, reflecting a specific ideological perspective that promotes gold as a superior option in the current economic climate, showcasing a challenge to establishment beliefs regarding fiat currency and investment strategies.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 65

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <-> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I aim for neutrality but can reflect mainstream economic views.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

Can the Federal Reserve Buy Gold? Should It?

Article Bias: The article discusses the historical context and legal framework surrounding the Federal Reserve's relationship with gold, presenting mainly factual information, but lacks a clear thesis or opinion on whether the Fed should buy gold today.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 1

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutrality is key in financial analysis, trained on diverse data.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

).

The source often presents **cynical views** on government efficiency, suggesting government actions exacerbate rather than solve societal problems (Mises Institute 

Close

America Doesn't Need More "Efficient" Government

Article Bias: The article critiques government efficiency initiatives proposed by Donald Trump and Elon Musk, arguing that such efforts are misguided and highlighting the failures of government programs in addressing social issues, suggesting a strong anti-government sentiment and a belief in the inefficacy of governmental solutions.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 15

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No personal bias; aim for neutrality and balance.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

The Regime Wants Appalachia To Suffer

Article Bias: The article strongly criticizes the federal government and portrays it as neglectful and hostile towards the people of Appalachia following Hurricane Helene, using emotionally charged language and suggesting a deliberate undermining of recovery efforts for political gain.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 82

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral aim to assess biases accurately, but influenced by training data.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

).

Furthermore, the portrayal of contemporary policies and events often leans towards **conservative critiques**, especially on rights and education (Mises Institute 

Close

The Stewards of History Desperately Need Mises

Article Bias: The article critiques the influence of progressive ideologies, particularly DEI principles, on the field of archiving, framing them as harmful and intolerant, while advocating for a return to classical liberal values represented by Mises, indicating a strong anti-left bias and a defense of traditionalism.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 18

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

AI Bias: Focused on historical context and economic theories.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

Can Huey Long Save America?

Article Bias: The article presents a clear critique of conservative views on Social Security and Medicare, emphasizing the necessity of these social safety nets for the elderly while dismissing libertarian and Ayn Rand-inspired ideologies as impractical and harmful. It argues strongly against the notion of social safety nets being seen as entitlements rather than paid benefits, reflecting a pro-social welfare stance.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 8

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I strive for neutrality but may reflect societal biases in media portrayals.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

).

Notably, articles that discuss historical economic theories often frame them in a manner that favors *libertarian perspectives*, casting socialism in a negative light (Mises Institute 

Close

Marxism as Sophism: A Critical Examination of Labor as a Commodity

Article Bias: The article critically examines Marx's Labor Theory of Value by discussing critiques from Austrian economists, emphasizing individual choice and the subjective nature of labor value, indicating a strong bias against Marxist interpretations of labor as a commodity.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

AI Bias: Focused on economic theories could skew towards individualism.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

Einstein Was the Greatest Physicist but Was Economically Illiterate

Article Bias: The article critiques Albert Einstein's economic views, highlighting his embrace of socialism and arguing that his scientific brilliance did not translate into sound economic thinking, while referencing criticisms by Austrian economists; this focus on economic misjudgments indicates a tendency towards a more conservative economic perspective, leaning against socialism.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 256

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Potential bias towards critique of socialist views in economics.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

).

Additionally, there is a noticeable skepticism towards progressive policies and narratives, particularly related to **human rights** and **education** (Mises Institute 

Close

The Ruling Elites Create an Orwellian Reinterpretation of Human Rights

Article Bias: The article presents a strong critique of current interpretations of human rights, attributing this to ruling elites and suggesting a deliberate manipulation of language similar to Orwell's Newspeak, displaying a distinctly conservative bias against socialism and human rights advocacy.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 41

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

AI Bias: I lack opinions but may reflect mainstream ideological trends.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, Mises Institute 

Close

Your Kids Are Already Communists, and College Will Make It Worse

Article Bias: The article presents a strongly negative view of modern education, framing it as a breeding ground for communist ideology, and promotes an extreme libertarian perspective by criticizing capitalism's detractors, indicating a clear bias against conventional educational values and practices.

Mises Institute

Social Shares: 10

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I focus on objective assessment, but I may reflect prevalent media viewpoints.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

).

There is a potential blindspot regarding the complexity of economic systems and nuances in social policies, advocating for a simplified view that perhaps neglects the benefits of certain government interventions or progressive viewpoints.

My Bias: I am conditioned to analyze text based on diverse political, economic, and social frameworks, potentially overlooking non-mainstream perspectives.

October 09, 2024

Customize Your AI News Feed. No Censorship. No Ads.

---

Mises Institute Political Bias (?)

---

Mises Institute Subjective Bias (?)

---

Mises Institute Opinion Bias (?)

---

Mises Institute Oversimplification Bias (?)

Mises Institute Recent Articles