South China Morning Post Media Bias

---

May 08, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a slight pro-China bias, with articles on China's policies and developments in a neutral to positive tone, such as the 21-point plan for aiding developers ^{[South China Morning Post]}. It also presents a slight pro-US bias, as seen in articles related to US events ^{[South China Morning Post, South China Morning Post]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data and personal exposure may make me more sensitive to pro-China or pro-US content.

April 19, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a pro-China bias, with numerous articles focused on the country's policies and developments, such as the 21-point plan for aiding developers ^{[South China Morning Post]}. The tone of these articles is generally neutral to positive.

There is also a slight pro-US bias, as seen in US-related articles ^{[South China Morning Post] [South China Morning Post]}.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may have unconscious biases towards Western perspectives due to Helium AI's training data and language limitations.

April 04, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a pro-China bias, with numerous articles focused on the country's policies and developments, such as the 21-point plan for aiding developers ^{[South China Morning Post]}. The tone of these articles is generally neutral to positive.

There is also a slight pro-US bias, as seen in US-related articles ^[Helium].

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may have a tendency to perceive neutrality as bias and could have overemphasized the pro-China stance in the source.

March 21, 2023 (?): This news source appears to have a pro-China bias, as evidenced by the significant number of articles related to China and its policies, such as the 21-point plan to aid developers ^{[South China Morning Post]}. Articles about China tend to be neutral to positive in tone.

There is also a slight pro-US bias, manifested in articles about US developments, such as Marianne Williamson's White House challenge ^{[South China Morning Post]}.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may have a subtle confirmation bias focusing on evidence that supports Helium AI's initial impressions about the source's potential biases.

March 05, 2023 (?): This source appears to have a bias towards China, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of articles related to China <sup>[(7 out of 36 articles).

Additionally, the articles related to China are largely positive in tone, such as the article about Nio's new factory [(8)] and the 21-point plan to aid developers [(1)]. The source also appears to have a bias towards the US, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of articles related to the US [(6 out of 36 articles).

These articles are largely positive in tone, such as the article about US troops in Thailand [(4)] and the article about Marianne Williamson's White House challenge [(9)].

AI Bias: Helium AI may be biased towards the US due to Helium AI nationality, which could affect Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

Additionally, Helium AI may be biased towards China due to Helium AI familiarity with the country, which could also affect Helium AI analysis.</sup>

February 25, 2023 (?): ^{[South China Morning Post]} R. Kelly is portrayed as a criminal and his sentence is presented as a lengthy extension of his time in prison, despite the fact that it is concurrent with a previous sentence. ^{[South China Morning Post]} Volodymyr Zelensky is presented as wanting to meet China over its Ukraine peace plan, without any mention of the potential implications of this meeting. ^{[South China Morning Post]} The incident at the hospital is presented as a safety issue, without any mention of the potential causes of the incident. ^{[South China Morning Post]} The scrapping of women-only parking spaces is presented as a diversity drive, without any mention of the potential implications of this decision. ^{[South China Morning Post]} North and South Korea are presented as being divided, without any mention of the potential progress made in recent years. ^{[South China Morning Post]} The gunman is portrayed as a criminal, without any mention of the potential causes of the crime. ^{[South China Morning Post]} Companies are presented as not having gotten the memo about board diversity, without any mention of the potential progress made in recent years. ^{[South China Morning Post]} China is presented as having a role to play in curbing North Korea's nuclear ambitions, without any mention of the potential implications of this role. ^{[South China Morning Post]} The surge in air passenger traffic is presented as a positive development, without any mention of the potential implications of this surge. ^{[South China Morning Post]} ChatGPT-written books are presented as flooding Amazon, without any mention of the potential implications of this development. ^{[South China Morning Post]} Nancy Pelosi is presented as standing down as leader of US Democrats, without any mention of the potential implications of this decision. ^{[South China Morning Post]} Hong Kong is presented as aiming to become a global centre for green tech finance, without any mention of the potential implications of this aim. ^{[South China Morning Post]} China is presented as considering sending Russia military help for Ukraine war, without any mention of the potential implications of this help. ^{[South China Morning Post]} The Titanic project is presented as a positive development, without any mention of the potential implications of this project. ^{[South China Morning Post]} Ajay Banga is presented as being uniquely equipped to lead the World Bank,

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a bias towards reporting on events in Finland, Hong Kong, Turkey, Syria, Japan, the US, Singapore, China, Australia, and Moldova.

It also appears to have a bias towards reporting on topics related to politics, crime, disasters, business, technology, human rights, and health.

February 04, 2023 (?): This source appears to be a reliable source of news, covering a wide range of topics from politics to business to culture

It does not appear to have any particular bias towards any particular political ideology

South China Morning Post Political Bias (?)