Unherd Media Bias | Helium Trades

Unherd Media Bias

News Bias (?):
General Bias Overview
The analyzed articles demonstrate significant skepticism towards various political figures and ideologies, particularly within the context of U.S. and UK politics.

The source exhibits a critical stance towards the Democratic Party, with several pieces highlighting perceived failures in leadership, adherence to certain ideologies, and the political disconnection from constituents (

Donald Trump's strange sincerity

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of the Democratic party and its leadership, contrasting it with a sympathetic perspective on Donald Trump's appeal to the electorate, suggesting a bias towards conservative viewpoints.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 2

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

📝 Prescriptive:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🤑 Advertising:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

AI Bias: Focus on political analysis may influence neutrality.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

Democrats need a new Clinton

Article Bias: The article critiques the Democratic Party's decline and contrasts it with past Republican successes, emphasizing the need for Democrats to adapt their approach while portraying current leadership as disconnected from mainstream concerns, thus leaning towards a more conservative outlook.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 6

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

📝 Prescriptive:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🤖 Written by AI:

AI Bias: I analyze content based on training data across diverse sources.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).

There appears to be an inclination towards conservative perspectives, especially concerning figures like Donald Trump and traditional structures (

Has Trump learnt from his mistakes?

Article Bias: The article presents a positive outlook on Trump's potential second term, emphasizing his learning from past mistakes, the importance of his appointments, and specific foreign policy strategies, while critiquing the establishment's influence and decisions during his first term.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 4

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📝 Prescriptive:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Favors clear and objective analysis but may lean politically.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

Covid masked liberal weakness

Article Bias: The article offers a critical perspective on Democratic leadership while framing Donald Trump's potential return as a likely outcome influenced by external factors like the pandemic, emphasizing a defense of Trump's handling of COVID and critiquing media narratives around him, suggesting a moderate conservative bias.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: My responses may reflect a balanced but critical view influenced by current political discourse.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).
Topics Covered
The articles explore a wide range of topics including:
Political Critique: A significant focus on party dynamics, highlighting failures (e.g., Democratic leadership and its treatment of certain social groups,

Why didn't Jews vote for Trump?

Article Bias: The article presents a strong critique of the Democratic Party's treatment of Jewish voters and positions Jews as having misaligned their voting choices, implicitly favoring conservative viewpoints while discussing issues of identity and government policies related to Israel and minorities.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: My training data may lean towards neutral analysis of articles.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

Burn down the Church Machine

Article Bias: The article discusses the challenges faced by the Church of England, critiquing its bureaucratic shift under Archbishop Welby while advocating for radical reform and inclusivity in its policies, especially regarding sexuality and leadership diversity.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 3

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <-> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral towards religious issues, but may emphasize inclusivity more.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).
International Relations: Critical examinations of foreign policies, particularly regarding Russia, Ukraine, and Middle Eastern issues (

Is Ukraine becoming a kleptocracy?

Article Bias: The article critically examines allegations of corruption and nationalization practices within the Ukrainian government under Zelensky, raising concerns about the misuse of Western aid, potential kleptocracy, and the impact on foreign investments, suggesting a negative view of the current Ukrainian administration's conduct amidst wartime circumstances.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 7

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and objective analysis based on provided data.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

The dangers of normalising Bashar al-Assad

Article Bias: The article expresses a critical view of the normalization of Bashar al-Assad's regime, highlighting the dangers faced by Syrian refugees and the challenges of returning to Syria, while stressing the humanitarian crisis exacerbated by ongoing conflict and government actions.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 2

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Focus on humanitarian issues, may overlook broader geopolitical context.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

Kamala Harris never stood a chance

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of Vice President Kamala Harris's candidacy and the complexities of American democracy, particularly focusing on her perceived inadequacies and the challenges faced by women and minorities in politics, weaving in themes of fear and societal expectations without offering a balanced perspective.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 109

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral but trained on a mix of perspectives leading to potential skew.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).
Public Health and Social Issues: Discussions around healthcare policies, drug addiction strategies, and immigration (

America will always be hooked on drugs

Article Bias: The article critiques harm reduction strategies for drug addiction in America, arguing that these approaches may lead to negative societal outcomes, while also referencing various socio-political dilemmas and trends. It displays skepticism towards mainstream narratives and solutions, hinting at a more conservative stance on drug policy and societal issues. The author critiques the inconsistency of harm reduction advocates and points to failures in the implementation of these policies, especially in Oregon.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I focus on factual analysis and may undervalue subjective interpretations.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

The progressive case against immigration

Article Bias: The article presents a progressive argument for stricter immigration policies, suggesting that acknowledging the downsides of mass immigration is necessary for the Democratic Party to reconnect with its working-class base, while critiquing those who conflate anti-racist activism with unrestricted immigration. The tone is analytical and presents a case for a more centrist immigration stance, using examples from both the U.S. and other countries, showing a fairly balanced view towards immigration while critically addressing aspects of current progressive ideology.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 22

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <-> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Trained on varied sources, may reflect typical political perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).
Bias Characteristics
The source often reflects biases of omission concerning progressive viewpoints, presenting a critique of liberal ideologies, particularly in discussions around immigration and public health (

Stonewall and the search for meaning

Article Bias: The article critiques the decline of public observance for Trans Day of Remembrance and explores the reasons behind it, using a skeptical tone that questions the motivations and effectiveness of LGBT+ activism as a substitute for traditional forms of commemoration.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 31

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited training data may influence neutrality.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

America will always be hooked on drugs

Article Bias: The article critiques harm reduction strategies for drug addiction in America, arguing that these approaches may lead to negative societal outcomes, while also referencing various socio-political dilemmas and trends. It displays skepticism towards mainstream narratives and solutions, hinting at a more conservative stance on drug policy and societal issues. The author critiques the inconsistency of harm reduction advocates and points to failures in the implementation of these policies, especially in Oregon.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I focus on factual analysis and may undervalue subjective interpretations.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).

There is a recurring skepticism toward mainstream narratives on issues like election integrity and youth political engagement, often aligning with more conservative perspectives (

Why the Left has no luck with men

Article Bias: The article discusses the shift of young men towards the Republican party, attributing it to perceived disdain from liberal society and societal changes, while critiquing the left's framing of young men's issues as 'toxic masculinity'; this approach presents a viewpoint that may be characterized as sympathetic to young men's struggles, but also adopts a critical tone towards leftist narratives.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 9

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <-> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited perspective on social issues and media representation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

,

Is Trump right to fear election fraud?

Article Bias: The article presents a viewpoint that supports the idea of election fraud concerns stemming from the 2020 election, emphasizing Trump's narrative and the alleged irregularities surrounding mail-in voting practices, which suggests a bias in favor of Trump and his supporters while also reflecting skepticism towards Democratic actions and judicial decisions.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 35

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📝 Prescriptive:

😨 Fearful:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

😢 Victimization:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: My data may lean toward established narratives in politics.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

).

My Bias: I may exhibit a bias towards detailed analytical frameworks and critical assessments due to my training data's focus on neutrality.

November 23, 2024

Customize Your AI News Feed. No Censorship. No Ads.

Unherd News Bias (?):

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

🍼 Immature:

✊ Ideological:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

Unherd Social Media Impact (?): 17

Discussion:

Unherd Most Similar Sources (?)

The Guardian (Opinion)

thespectator.com

The Atlantic

Counterpunch

Jacobin

American Spectator

Unherd Recent Articles

Sort By:

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship.

Market Forecasts

Bullish / Bearish

Digital Assets / Most Accurate

Trading Strategies

Long Volatility

Short Volatility

Balanced News

Balanced News / Sources

Tech / Memes / Politics

About

About / Pricing / Forum

Contact Helium Trades

2024 © Helium Trades
Privacy Policy & Disclosure

* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.