Become A Wiser, More Profitable Investor

Unherd Media Bias

---

The articles predominantly reflect a conservative bias, particularly in their skepticism towards government actions, modern progressivism, and liberal ideologies.

Unherd 

Close

Annexation has always haunted Canada

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of Canadian-U.S. relations, particularly highlighting historical anxieties about American influence and annexation, while expressing skepticism towards recent political responses, particularly from figures like Trump, suggesting a negative perception of American policies, yet remains anchored in historical context.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 2

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Trained to maintain neutrality but leaning towards critical historical analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

For instance, critiques of the UK government's Prevent strategy highlight failures of bureaucracy while advocating for a more proactive policing approach Unherd 

Close

Why Prevent isn't fit for purpose

Article Bias: The article critiques the UK government's Prevent strategy for countering extremism, arguing that it is ineffective and overly bureaucratic, ultimately failing to address the real threats posed by individuals like Axel Rudakubana. The piece reflects a deep skepticism towards government processes, highlighting missed opportunities in identifying potential threats, and suggests a need for reform that prioritizes active policing over bureaucratic measures. The author’s personal background in counterterrorism lends credibility but suggests a potential bias toward law enforcement solutions.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral, factual analysis of political topics.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

.

Meanwhile, historical comparisons between Donald Trump's and McKinley’s economic policies hints at a nostalgic fondness for past protectionist views, suggesting a support for conservative economic frameworks Unherd 

Close

Can Trump make McKinley great again?

Article Bias: The article draws parallels between Donald Trump's economic policies and those of William McKinley, suggesting a nostalgic and favorable view of protectionism while highlighting historical contexts, but it presents a complex narrative that acknowledges criticisms of Trump’s approach.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral analysis through historical context.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

.

It is notable that the author often portrays liberal policies and figures—like Joe Biden, Justin Trudeau, and the Democratic Party—as ineffective or ideologically driven Unherd 

Close

Donald Trump is the end of Hilarity

Article Bias: The article carries a strong anti-Biden sentiment, portraying his administration as fake and ideologically driven while favorably contrasting Trump as more authentic and human; it critiques progressive politics and media influence, leaning towards conservative perspectives on governance and reality.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 29

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral analysis but may reflect training data perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

Unherd 

Close

Farewell to Canada's Sun King

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of Justin Trudeau's leadership, contrasting his initial promise with subsequent disappointments, while also contextualizing his political rise within broader ideological trends, thus reflecting a somewhat negative perspective on liberalism and Trudeau's effectiveness as a leader.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 18

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Focused on neutrality, aiming for consistency and accuracy in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

. Areas such as gender dynamics and DEI initiatives are approached critically, indicating a resistance to contemporary progressive narratives and ideological shifts Unherd 

Close

How small dick energy gave us Trump

Article Bias: The article critiques contemporary gender dynamics, particularly the implications of terms like 'small dick energy' in the context of masculinity and misogyny, while reflecting on a personal experience of cultural differences. It leans toward skepticism of progressive narratives and emphasizes the author's disapproval of the way gendered insults are normalized, revealing a nuanced, albeit critical stance on current societal discussions around masculinity and environmentalism.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 13

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: My training data may have progressive inclinations affecting appraisal.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

Unherd 

Close

So Trump nixed your bullshit DEI job

Article Bias: The article critiques Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, presenting them as unnecessary and detrimental bureaucratic roles, reflecting a conservative viewpoint against the growth of such programs, particularly in light of a recent political decision by Trump to limit DEI employment in the federal government.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 13

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📝 Prescriptive:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: AI trained on diverse data, neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

.

Moreover, issues surrounding media representation and political propaganda are scrutinized, revealing a broader concern with integrity in governance and cultural narratives, though sometimes through a lens that emphasizes traditional values over modern norms.

The overall tone indicates an undercurrent of skepticism towards elite and bureaucratic processes, alongside a definitive pro-law enforcement stance that can skew analyses of social issues Unherd 

Close

Why the police ignored the rape gangs

Article Bias: The article critiques British police for their inaction regarding grooming gangs, attributing this negligence to political correctness and racial sensitivity, thus suggesting a strong critique of institutional racism in policing, while maintaining a narrative that emphasizes law enforcement's failures during this crisis.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 107

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Minimal biases; answers based on article content.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

Unherd 

Close

Europe is clinging to yesterday

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of Europe’s complacency regarding Donald Trump's influence, emphasizing a sense of impending division and unrest within European politics due to Trump’s approach, while showcasing a negative outlook on complacency among European leaders regarding their relationships with the U.S.

Unherd Bias

Social Shares: 72

This article is similar to For the Love of God, Stop Saying Trump Was an Antiwar President

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I focus on critical analysis which may affect interpretation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

.

In summary, the source combines critiques of liberalism and modern social dynamics with a favorable view of conservative policies and beliefs, especially regarding governance and economic frameworks.

Helium Bias: I am trained on data reflecting a variety of perspectives, influencing my interpretation towards more analytical and structured viewpoints, potentially overlooking emotional nuances.

(?)  February 01, 2025

Current Unherd Bias

Understanding Media Bias      View All Sources     

---

Customize Your AI News Feed. No Censorship. No Ads.

---

How To Interpret?

---

Unherd Recent Articles

Sort By:      Bullish Positive Interesting Popularity Liberal Conservative Sensational Objectivity Relevance Bearish Date