Become A Wiser, More Profitable Investor

Snopes Media Bias

---

General Bias Overview

This source exhibits a predominantly neutral tone in many articles, often focusing on fact-checking and debunking misinformation.

However, it tends to lean towards a more critical view of right-wing narratives and figures, reflecting a moderate liberal bias. Articles that analyze figures like Trump often provide a skeptical perspective on conservative policies, indicating an implicit bias against conservative ideologies Snopes 

Close

Unpacking claims that higher education leads to more liberal political viewpoints

Article Bias: The article explores the relationship between higher education and political ideologies, referencing studies that suggest a correlation between increased education and liberal political views, while also addressing counter-arguments and perspectives that question this connection, indicating a balanced examination but with a noticeable focus on the liberal narrative.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral language, but trained on diverse sources potentially influence nuance.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

.

Main Themes and Topics

The source primarily addresses themes surrounding politics, social issues, and celebrity scandals. It often critiques high-profile conservative figures, as seen in articles discussing Trump’s policies or controversial statements.

Many of its pieces reflect progressive perspectives, particularly on issues related to social justice and media literacy Snopes 

Close

Will telling 23andMe to delete personal data protect your genetic information? Not entirely

Article Bias: The article discusses the risks associated with data privacy following 23andMe's bankruptcy, presenting expert opinions while emphasizing the importance of consumer actions, resulting in a cautionary tone regarding personal data and corporate responsibility.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 16

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to assessment tools and data; strive for objectivity.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, 3].

Bias of Omission and Blindspots

While the source frequently debunks claims and provides a fact-based critique of conservative figures, it may exhibit a bias of omission by underreporting similar claims that could challenge liberal narratives.

For instance, critiques of conservative misinformation predominate, whereas liberal figures are less scrutinized in similar contexts, indicating a potential blindspot regarding coverage that favors liberal analytical scrutiny Snopes 

Close

20 rumors involving US immigration authorities, fact-checked

Article Bias: The article offers a fact-checking perspective on various rumors surrounding U.S. immigration, acknowledging a history of misinformation and the effects of the Trump administration's policies while attempting to present a balanced view of both the rumors and the involved authorities.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 0

This article is similar to Update Article - Family Research Council

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Trained on diverse sources, may overlook nuance in biases.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, 2].

Inconsistencies and Potential Propaganda

Despite maintaining factual accuracy in reporting, inconsistencies arise from a selective emphasis on stories that align with progressive narratives.

This could lead to a perception of propaganda, intentionally shaping public discourse toward inclusivity while sidelining more conservative viewpoints.

The emphasis on high-engagement topics might further propagate this distortion by sometimes prioritizing sensationalism over nuanced discussions Snopes 

Close

Trump's June 2020 protest remarks misrepresented as comment on 2025 'Hands Off!' rallies

Article Bias: The article discusses the context and misrepresentation of Trump's past remarks related to protests, highlighting the misleading use of a meme in connection with recent protests against him and Musk, while providing insights into the rallies organized by various groups; it leans towards a critical perspective of Trump and emphasizes the importance of context.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 18

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I focus on providing balanced and fact-based analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

, 7].

Conclusion

Overall, while the source shows commitment to fact-checking and accuracy, its editorial choices indicate a bias leaning toward progressive narratives, particularly evident in its coverage of social and political issues related to right-wing misinformation. This relationship between coverage and inferred biases forms a complex tapestry that both promotes media literacy and reflects a noticeable agenda toward progressive thought Snopes 

Close

No credible evidence supports claims of vast underground structures found beneath Egyptian pyramids

Article Bias: The article critically debunks recent claims of underground structures beneath the Egyptian pyramids, highlighting the lack of credible evidence and emphasizing the association with fringe theories and conspiracy outlets, thus presenting a skeptical viewpoint on sensational claims.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 188

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: My training data includes critical perspectives on fringe theories.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Close

.

Helium Bias: I tend to view sources through a lens that emphasizes progressive narratives, reflecting my training data's focus on liberal perspectives.

(?)  April 19, 2025

Current Snopes Bias

Understanding Media Bias      View All Sources     

---

Customize Your AI News Feed. No Censorship. No Ads.

---

How To Interpret?

---

Snopes Recent Articles

Sort By:      Liberal Bearish Positive Conservative Popularity Interesting Bullish Date Objectivity Relevance Sensational