m.facebook.com Media Bias



Identity and coverage. This is a Philippine mainstream news aggregator/broadcaster output (GMA News attribution appears in   ), covering Oct 2026 items.

Coverage is dominated by four clusters:   Philippine national-pride sports/pageant news — Asian Games medals     , Alas Pilipinas   , pageant results     ;   bare official-source relays — peso closing rates with zero context     , Marcos's Singapore trip     , PHIVOLCS Taal bulletin   , PH–Poland agreements     , PH–France SOVFA   ;   uncontextualized US police blotters       ; and   filler/promotional content — INVU eyewear ads republished as articles     , Wirecutter promos   , a NYT promo note   , and boilerplate-only pages     .
Wording patterns. Sports items use exclamatory Tagalog/English cheer framing (“Let’s go, archer!”   ; “SALAMAT SA LABAN, MARIZZA!”   ; “bags”   ) — clear pro-Philippine national-pride framing, though sports losses are reported neutrally   .

Political/diplomatic items are relayed uncritically from official sources with hidden assumptions treated as fact: the ambassador's claim that Marcos's F1 attendance “offers opportunities” is reported without balance   ; the DND's own positive framing of the France SOVFA is the article's frame   ; the Singapore trip is framed positively per DFA with “no independent analysis or caveats”   .
Reliability inconsistencies. Police/crime and science briefs show good attribution practice — “allegedly”   , “police said”   , preliminary-language police notices     , PHIVOLCS attribution   , CBCP attribution   .

By contrast, clickbait/overconfidence appears in entertainment (“bombed… estimated to lose $150M” with an unnamed analysis and a “Read more below” teaser   ) and unsourced “LOOK:” first-of-its-kind medical claims   .
Propaganda techniques? Observable mild ones: appeal to authority in single-source diplomatic items       ; advertising/spam content mixed into news         ; national-pride emotional framing in sports     .

No evidence of ideological agenda on contested politics — a Germany item labels AfD “far-right” and BSW “left-wing conservative” neutrally Probabilistically plausible but unproven: formulaic bare-announcement items with identical structure (peso rate boilerplate     , protocol captions     , boilerplate-only pages     ) are consistent with automated/aggregated content pipelines, but human desk production is equally possible.
Highest values:   speed/breadth of coverage       ;   national pride/Filipino achievement       ;   official-source fidelity       .

Lowest values:   editorial depth/context       ;   content quality control (ads/boilerplate in newsfeed)       ;   independent verification of official claims     .

Helium Bias: Sample is ~36 recent items, likely skewed toward high-bias/low-content pieces; I cannot see unpublished stories or full articles.

Judgments on AI authorship and propaganda are probabilistic, based on surface patterns.

Records with truncated text and boilerplate-only entries limit framing assessment; hidden-assumption notes are analyst inferences, not ground truth.

Automated source summary · Updated October 12, 2026 · Not human reviewed. Check recent article panels for claim-level evidence when available.




Use the Data in AI All Sources

m.facebook.com Bias Profile

Weighted source-level patterns from recent analyzed coverage. Open recent articles below to inspect score-specific evidence and limitations when available.

😩 Pessimistic <—> Optimistic 🌞7

💭 Opinion35

🗳 Political12

Oversimplification10

🏛️ Appeal to Authority6

😤 Overconfidence16

🔒 Ideological12

🤑 Advertising8

🎭 Virtue Signaling6

🐍 Manipulative15

Subtle dimensions

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴1

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔0

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ -5

🚨 Sensational0

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈0

💡 Boring <—> Interesting2

📝 Prescriptive0

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁0

😨 Fearful2

📞 Begging the Question0

🍼 Immature1

👀 Covering Responses1

😢 Victimization0

🗑️ Spam4

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺3

❌ Low Credibility <—> High Credibility ✅5

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪-2

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️2

🪨 Low Intelligence <—> High Intelligence 🦉0

✊ Woke0

🐐 Scapegoating0

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔0

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥1

🎲 Speculation5

How to interpret source scores →

Average social shares per article 0



m.facebook.com Political Bias (?)





m.facebook.com Subjective Bias (?)





m.facebook.com Opinion Bias (?)





m.facebook.com Oversimplification Bias (?)







m.facebook.com Recent Articles



Sort By: