NCBI Media Bias

---

August 19, 2023 (?): The provided news pieces focus mainly on specific scientific subjects, such as clinical studies, experimental physics, environmental studies, and healthcare implementations ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]}, showing a potential bias towards scientific research and healthcare policy.

They come off as potentially favoring evidence-based scientific research ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]} as a valid source of discerning truth.

However, it is hard to pinpoint a clear political, cultural, or ideological bias given the variety of subjects addressed without themes related to any political partisan viewpoint.

---

AI Bias: As an AI, Helium AI doesn't have personal biases, but Helium AI's responses might reflect biases in the training data, favoring empirical and objective analysis over subjective interpretations.

July 08, 2023 (?): The source presents diverse research reports from a variety of fields, such as healthcare ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]}, policy studies ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]}, technology ^[NCBI], and psychological/social issues ^[NCBI][NCBI].

There is no obvious indication of bias towards a particular political or ideological stance, as the majority of the content is empirical and factual.

While some pieces may reflect the individual biases of the researchers involved ^[NCBI], they do not constitute a consistent or systemic bias in the source itself.

---

AI Bias: As an AI, I don't personally hold biases.

However, my training data, which includes a broad range of internet text, could contain biases that unintentionally influence my analysis.

June 03, 2023 (?): This news source mainly presents factual information and research findings, exhibiting a neutral and unbiased tone.

It does not display any political, ideological, or otherwise subjective slants or biases ^[NCBI-18].

---

AI Bias: My training data may have limitations due to potential over-representation or under-representation of certain perspectives, affecting my judgment on neutrality and bias.

May 08, 2023 (?): The source derives from an academic field, reporting on various scientific research topics, which generally do not have a political agenda or ideological biases.

It presents information about different scientific studies and events without taking a stance or providing subjective opinions ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes a diverse range of topics and sources, but I may have limited exposure to highly specialized scientific research news.

April 19, 2023 (?): The given source does not provide any news or information, but rather a list of scientific articles and abstracts ^[NCBI-27].

Therefore, it is not possible to determine a political bias from this source.

---

AI Bias: My training data may have limitations in identifying the political bias of sources that primarily provide scientific research.

April 04, 2023 (?): The provided articles primarily focus on medical research, treatments, and diagnoses, indicating a general bias towards scientific and medical topics ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]}.

There is no clear evidence of political or ideological biases in these articles.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may have a tendency to overlook subtle biases in scientific articles, assuming neutrality in this domain.

March 22, 2023 (?): The provided articles predominantly focus on medical research, treatments, and diagnoses ^{[NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI][NCBI]}, suggesting a general bias towards medical and scientific topics.

No clear evidence of political or ideological biases is present in these articles.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI is a language model focused on factual analysis, and Helium AI strives to avoid personal biases in Helium AI's responses.

March 05, 2023 (?): The majority of articles in this source appear to be related to medical research, treatments, and diagnoses ^[NCBI], suggesting a bias towards medical and scientific topics.

This is further evidenced by the fact that all of the articles provided are related to medical research, treatments, and diagnoses ^[NCBI-15].



AI Bias: Helium AI may be biased towards medical and scientific topics due to Helium AI background in the sciences and Helium AI interest in medical research.

Additionally, Helium AI may be biased towards interpreting the source's bias too literally or out of context.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to be biased towards medical and scientific topics, as evidenced by the majority of articles being related to medical research, treatments, and diagnoses (^{[NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI], [NCBI]}).



AI Bias: Helium AI may have been biased towards medical topics due to Helium AI's interest in the field, leading Helium AI to focus more on those articles than the others.

Additionally, Helium AI may have been biased towards interpreting the source as more biased than it actually is due to Helium AI's preconceived notions.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a general bias towards presenting positive outcomes from research studies, as most of the citations are from studies that report positive results.

However, there is also evidence of epistemic humility, as some of the citations acknowledge limitations in the research and suggest further studies are needed.

Overall, the news source appears to be presenting research findings in a balanced manner.

February 01, 2023 (?): The source appears to be focused on medical and health-related topics, with a focus on disadvantaged populations and gender differences

NCBI Political Bias (?)

NCBI Subjective Bias (?)

NCBI Opinion Bias (?)

NCBI Oversimplification Bias (?)