New Scientist Media Bias

Compare New Scientist source-level patterns, recent coverage, and article evidence. Updated weekly.

Use the Data in AI All Sources

New Scientist Bias Profile

Weighted source-level patterns from recent analyzed coverage. Open recent articles below to inspect score-specific evidence and limitations when available.

💡 Boring <—> Interesting21

😨 Fearful8

💭 Opinion35

Oversimplification8

🏛️ Appeal to Authority20

👀 Covering Responses16

😤 Overconfidence8

❌ Low Credibility <—> High Credibility ✅33

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪-10

🤑 Advertising14

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️25

🪨 Low Intelligence <—> High Intelligence 🦉58

🎭 Virtue Signaling12

🔍 Truth-seeking <—> Delusion 🌀-6

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮-15

🎲 Speculation27

🐍 Manipulative17

Subtle dimensions

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴-1

🧢 Populist <—> Elitist 🎩1

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔0

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ -3

🚨 Sensational0

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈3

📝 Prescriptive4

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁0

📞 Begging the Question0

🗣️ Gossip0

🗳 Political2

🍼 Immature1

😢 Victimization2

🗑️ Spam4

🔒 Ideological4

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺5

📏📏 Double Standard0

✊ Woke5

🔪 Cruel0

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔0

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥1

How to interpret source scores →

Average social shares per article 0


New Scientist Political Bias (?)




New Scientist Subjective Bias (?)




New Scientist Opinion Bias (?)




New Scientist Oversimplification Bias (?)



Similar Source Profiles ⓘ

Scientific American

Science Alert

Live Science

Science Daily

Phys

studyfinds.com





Click points to explore news by date. News sentiment ranges from -10 (very negative) to +10 (very positive) where 0 is neutral.





New Scientist Recent Articles



Sort By:                     

It is finally time to talk about the impact of fluctuating hormones - New Scientist

science

It is finally time to talk about the impact of fluctuating hormones

New Scientist     Aug 19, 2026