nltimes.nl Media Bias



Source identity: A Dutch news aggregator/wire (ANP-style) focused on Netherlands domestic affairs.

Topic coverage: crime/courts (shooting   , Hells Angels raids   , rape conviction   , absentia murder trial   , VAT fraud   , police shooting   ), asylum policy (  ,   , [36]), politics (  ,   ,   ,   ), economics/business (  ,   ,   ,   ), health/climate (  ,   ,   ), and social issues (  ,   ,   ).

Keyword analysis shows outsized focus on life expectancy       and asylum seekers     [36].



Framing patterns: Predominantly attributed, wire-style reporting with visible sourcing (  ,   ,   ).

No clear left/right editorial line: it relays government policy uncritically (heat pumps   ; vape tax   ) while also giving a mildly conservative-coded headline on deportations   and favorable LGBTQ-advocacy framing   . Institution-heavy: Public Prosecution Service accounts are frequently adopted as authoritative (  ,   ,   ), an establishment/official-source lean that also produces sympathetic framing for controversial figures (Gaza student framed as victim of a 'misunderstanding'   ).



Emotional skew: More emotional language in asylum-related pieces [36], e.g., landlord-negligence framing with fearful tenant quotes   and anonymous staff complaints treated as credible   .

Reliability: Generally strong — named sources, hedged allegations, uncertainty flags (  ,   ,   ).

Weak spots include an unsourced Gaza casualty figure   and heavy reliance on anonymous internal letters   .

AI authorship: Probabilistic hypothesis, not fact. Evidence consistent with it: uniformly neutral register, formulaic structure, zero social media shares across all items, and rapid high-volume output with few analytic quotes.

Human editorship is also plausible given the newsroom-standard attribution practice.



Propaganda techniques: No overt propaganda; closest observable patterns are appeal to authority (  ,   ,   ) and selection bias favoring official framings (  ,   ), but these are passive sourcing biases, not directed manipulation.



Highest 3 values:   Institutional order/official process — courts, OM, ministries treated as the frame of record (  ,   ,   );   Factual accuracy/attribution — hedging and sourcing discipline (  ,   );   Social welfare/inclusion — LGBTQ rights   , disability support   , worker safety   .

Lowest 3 values:   Independent adversarial scrutiny — little critical examination of state or corporate claims (  ,   ,   );   Classical liberal skepticism of state power — mandates and restrictions reported descriptively, never challenged (  ,   ,   ,   );   Emotional distance from official narratives — empathetic sourcing flows toward state-favored parties (  ,   ), while countervailing citizen/resident voice is underweighted (  ).



Blind spots: No counterexample appears in the sample of the source independently debunking an official claim; audience engagement (0 shares) suggests minimal editorial investment in reader-facing judgment.

Helium Bias: I judged only ~38 records, all from 2026, possibly selected toward higher-bias articles; coverage of unpublished stories is unobservable.

Bias determinations rely on secondary analyst annotations, not primary text.

AI authorship is inferred stylistically and remains unverified.

Source identity is inferred, not confirmed.

Automated source summary · Updated October 12, 2026 · Not human reviewed. Check recent article panels for claim-level evidence when available.




Use the Data in AI All Sources

nltimes.nl Bias Profile

Weighted source-level patterns from recent analyzed coverage. Open recent articles below to inspect score-specific evidence and limitations when available.

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ -24

😩 Pessimistic <—> Optimistic 🌞-6

💡 Boring <—> Interesting9

😨 Fearful10

💭 Opinion25

🗳 Political18

Oversimplification8

🏛️ Appeal to Authority20

👀 Covering Responses18

😢 Victimization16

😤 Overconfidence16

🔒 Ideological8

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺7

❌ Low Credibility <—> High Credibility ✅32

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪-17

🤖 Written by AI18

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️26

🪨 Low Intelligence <—> High Intelligence 🦉38

✊ Woke10

🎭 Virtue Signaling12

🔍 Truth-seeking <—> Delusion 🌀-16

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮-9

🎲 Speculation13

🐍 Manipulative20

Subtle dimensions

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴-3

🧢 Populist <—> Elitist 🎩2

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔0

🚨 Sensational0

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈-1

📝 Prescriptive0

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁0

📞 Begging the Question0

🗣️ Gossip2

🍼 Immature1

📏📏 Double Standard0

🤑 Advertising4

🐐 Scapegoating0

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔0

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥4

How to interpret source scores →

Average social shares per article 0

Discuss this source




nltimes.nl Recent Articles




Sort By:                     














Build a focused, ad-free news feed.

Create Free Feed