Transparent Machine Learning Stocks + Digital Assets Forecasts*
If you don't make over $60 your first month, get your money back.
Become a more profitable investor with our transparent AI stock forecasts.
Increase your awareness with intelligent & balanced business news feed.
Stay on top with forecast models models trained, tested, and updated every day.
The news feed designed to reduce addiction and increase your understanding.
We will never sell, rent, or give your personal information away under any circumstance.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
The blue line is Helium's historical forecast. The black line is the actual closing price. Full transparency of past predictions. Hover over points for more information. Video Tutorial.
Future Price Cone
The future price cone means the model thinks there is a 80% chance the price will land within the bounds of the cone. A blue cone is neutral, a green cone is bullish, and a red cone is bearish.
Model Correlation
Higher (closer to 1) means a more accurate model and lower (closer to -1) means a less accurate model. This is the Spearman Correlation between model predicted percent change and actual percent change calculated over the last 150 days.
Percent Correct (up or down)
This is the percent of the time our models predicted the correct direction of the price (either up or down) over the last 150 days.
Tip:
Left click and drag charts to zoom in. Right click to zoom back out.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Helium Summary:
The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council ruling, which required judges to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws.
This 6-3 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo transfers interpretive power back to the judiciary, reducing federal agencies' autonomy [AP][The Federalist]. This could profoundly impact regulations across numerous sectors, including health care, environment, finance, and technology [grist.org][CNN]. Advocates argue that this will curb executive overreach and enhance judicial scrutiny [The American Conservative], while critics contend it will create legal uncertainty and undermine specialized agency expertise [grist.org][bakerdonelson.com][CNN].
June 29, 2024
Evidence
"The 6-3 decision...overturned Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council" [AP]
"Overturning provides a path for parties to challenge agency regulations" [bakerdonelson.com]
Perspectives
Pro-Court Decision
Supports argue that the ruling curtails the excessive power of unelected bureaucrats, compelling agencies to act within strict statutory limits. They believe this reinstates judicial oversight and prevents legislative abdication where Congress relies on agencies to fill in legal gaps [The Federalist][AP].
Pro-Agency Autonomy
Critics maintain that overturning Chevron deference diminishes the role of expertise in complex regulatory areas, potentially derailing environmental, health, and financial regulations. They warn of increased legal challenges and regulatory paralysis as courts, lacking specialized knowledge, may overrule nuanced agency decisions [grist.org][bakerdonelson.com].
My Bias
My training data includes diverse viewpoints but lacks insights into the detailed legal understandings of statutory interpretation. Thus, I might underrepresent the nuanced legal doctrines and practical regulatory implications of this ruling. My analysis attempts neutrality but could implicitly lean towards stability and predictability arguments often associated with maintaining the status quo.
What prompted the Supreme Court to overturn the Chevron deference doctrine?
The Court's conservative majority viewed Chevron as granting excessive power to federal agencies, undermining judicial oversight and legislative responsibility [The Federalist][AP]. How could this ruling impact the health care sector?
It may lead to increased litigation against health care regulations, as courts gain authority to independently review agency interpretations [bakerdonelson.com].
Conservative sources emphasize the victory against bureaucratic overreach and restoration of judicial authority, portraying Chevron as an enabler of unaccountable regulation [The Federalist][City Journal]. Liberal sources highlight the potential disruption to regulatory consistency and the undermining of expertise crucial for sectors like environment and health [grist.org][bakerdonelson.com]. Both perspectives display ideological stances about government power distribution, with conservatives favoring judicial scrutiny and liberals advocating for specialized agency autonomy.
Social Media Perspectives
People express a variety of opinions and emotions about the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron deference doctrine.
Some view it as a positive move towards holding regulatory agencies accountable, while others fear it could lead to less effective governance and increased judicial activism.
The decision elicits feelings of hope for improved checks and balances, but also concerns about potential negative impacts on environmental regulations, consumer protections, and administrative efficiency.
Emotions range from optimism to apprehension across the spectrum.
Context
Chevron deference historically allowed agencies significant leeway in interpreting ambiguous laws, supporting expansive regulatory frameworks in diverse sectors, from environment to health .
Takeaway
This ruling rebalance judicial-agency power dynamics, emphasizing judicial scrutiny over administrative interpretation, impacting diverse regulatory domains.
Potential Outcomes
Outcome: Increased judicial involvement in regulatory matters (High Probability). Explanation: Courts will now adjudicate ambiguous statutes independently, likely leading to more frequent legal challenges and judicial reviews.
Outcome: Regulatory uncertainty and delays (Medium Probability). Explanation: Agencies may become cautious in rulemaking, anticipating potential judicial reversals, possibly stalling crucial regulations in health, environment, and technology sectors.
* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy
of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions,
you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Ask any question about this page!
