An opinionated critique that frames the Supreme Court as increasingly political, documenting a consistent pattern of conservative-leaning outcomes across abortion, gun rights, race, voting, labor, and regulation, while highlighting ethics controversies and the shadow docket to argue that public trust hinges on perceived neutrality rather than ideology.
An opinion column by Duncan Levin, Harvard Law School lecturer, criticizing the Supreme Court's perceived ideological bias and ethics controversies, referencing Roe v. Wade, Bruen, Dobbs, Citizens United, Shelby County, Loper Bright, and the 2024 Trump immunity decision.
Training data skew toward mainstream Western outlets; bias may lean liberal; strive neutrality.
2026 © Helium Trades
Privacy Policy & Disclosure
* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy
of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions,
you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
