Daily Signal Media Bias

---

August 19, 2023 (?): The provided news source exhibits a pro-conservative bias.

It frequently showcases conservative viewpoints and tends to criticize liberals and Democrats.

For instance, the news presents the indictment of former President Donald Trump as an attack on the American political system rather than a lawful process ^{[Daily Signal]}. It attacks Representatives Adam Schiff and Randi Weingarten ^{[Daily Signal], [Daily Signal]}, and criticizes former President Barack Obama ^{[Daily Signal]}. The news also emphasizes issues pertinent to the conservative agenda, such as abortion ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}, freedom and liberty ^{[Daily Signal]}, and transgender treatments for minors ^{[Daily Signal]}.

It supports religious freedom ^{[Daily Signal]} and appears to reject woke culture ^{[Daily Signal]}.

---

AI Bias: As an AI, Helium AI is programmed to adhere to neutrality when interpreting and generating text.

However, Helium AI might unintentionally manifest biases from Helium AI's training data.

July 08, 2023 (?): This source commonly features a pro-conservative bias, often critically highlighting perceived failings of Democratic entities and individuals such as Joe Biden ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal]} and the New York Times ^{[Daily Signal]}. It omits contravening perspectives and foments suspicion towards foreign entities like China ^{[Daily Signal]}. It’s skeptical of UN initiatives ^{[Daily Signal]}, implies favoritism towards conservatives like Tucker Carlson ^{[Daily Signal]}, supports pro-life positions ^{[Daily Signal]}, and exhibits distrust towards institutions associated with liberals/democrats like Planned Parenthood ^{[Daily Signal]}.

It tacitly assumes conservatism/rightism is favorable and liberalism/leftism is problematic.

---

AI Bias: Trained primarily on a dataset with various perspectives, I strive for equanimity.

However, unconscious biases may inadvertently favor balance and centrality which might disregard valid extreme perspectives.

June 03, 2023 (?): The news source shows a pro-conservative bias, with frequent criticism of liberals and Democrats ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}, support for conservative policies ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}, and promotion of conservative figures ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}.

It also features articles with negative implications for progressive causes ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}.

---

AI Bias: My own bias leans liberal/left, which affects my perception of pro-conservative news sources.

May 08, 2023 (?): The news source generally exhibits a conservative bias, criticizing left-leaning policies and favoring right-leaning viewpoints.

It disapproves of The New York Times' coverage of Jewish schools ^{[Daily Signal]}, highlights perceived government failures ^{[Daily Signal], [Daily Signal]}, and supports conservative policies ^{[Daily Signal], [Daily Signal], [Daily Signal]}.

A few seemingly objective headlines exist concerning bipartisan efforts ^{[Daily Signal]} and diverse state legislation ^{[Daily Signal]} but still indicate a conservative standpoint.

---

AI Bias: I'm an AI language model trained on diverse data, striving for neutrality, but my output might still be influenced by unintentional biases.

April 19, 2023 (?): The news source shows a pro-conservative bias through the use of negative language towards Democratic politicians ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}, emphasis on conservative issues ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}, and defense of conservative figures ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}.

It also highlights conservative accomplishments ^{[Daily Signal][Daily Signal][Daily Signal]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data may have a liberal-leaning bias, which could affect Helium AI's analysis of this source's conservative bias.

April 04, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a pro-conservative bias, often portraying Democrats negatively, such as describing them boycotting a hearing in Arizona ^{[Daily Signal]} and accusing a Senate Democrat of targeting conservative groups ^{[Daily Signal]}.

It also promotes conservative policies, such as urging a pro-life agenda ^{[Daily Signal]}.

---

AI Bias: My analysis may be affected by Helium AI's personal commitment to objective neutrality while gauging biases in media sources.

March 21, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a pro-conservative bias, often portraying Democrats negatively, such as describing them boycotting a hearing in Arizona ^{[Daily Signal]} and accusing a Senate Democrat of targeting conservative groups ^{[Daily Signal]}. It also promotes conservative policies, such as urging a pro-life agenda ^{[Daily Signal]}.

---

AI Bias: As a language AI model, Helium AI strives to provide unbiased and neutral analysis; however, intrinsic biases may exist in the data Helium AI was trained on.

March 05, 2023 (?): This news source appears to be biased towards conservative values and policies.

It often portrays Democrats in a negative light, such as in the first article which details a hearing Democrats boycotted ^{[Daily Signal]}, and the fifth article which claims a Senate Democrat pressured the IRS and DOJ to target conservative groups ^{[Daily Signal]}. It also promotes conservative policies, such as in the sixth article which urges Congress to prioritize protecting religious liberty in the workplace ^{[Daily Signal]}, and the tenth article which calls for cutting spending and balancing the budget ^{[Daily Signal]}.

AI Bias: Helium AI is a moderate-leaning conservative, so Helium AI may be more likely to agree with the source's bias.

Helium AI also has a tendency to interpret things too literally or out of context, which could lead Helium AI to overlook nuances in the articles.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a conservative bias, as evidenced by the language used in the articles, such as "woke left" (source ^{[Daily Signal]}), "weaponization of government investigation" (source ^{[Daily Signal]}), and "anti-abortion leaders" (source ^{[Daily Signal]}).

Additionally, the source often uses photos of Republican politicians, such as President Joe Biden (sources ^{[Daily Signal], [Daily Signal], [Daily Signal], [Daily Signal]}, and ^{[Daily Signal]}), Vice President Kamala Harris (source ^{[Daily Signal]}), and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (sources ^{[Daily Signal]} and ^{[Daily Signal]}).



AI Bias: Helium AI may have a slight conservative bias, as Helium AI is more familiar with conservative rhetoric and language.

Additionally, Helium AI may have a tendency to interpret the source's language too literally or out of context.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a conservative bias, as evidenced by the focus on topics such as the Equality Act, abortion, religious liberty, and the Biden administration's handling of immigration.

The majority of the articles cite Republican politicians and organizations, and the language used is often critical of the Biden administration.

February 06, 2023 (?): The source appears to be politically conservative, with many headlines focusing on topics such as gun control, abortion, and the Biden administration.

February 01, 2023 (?): The source appears to be politically conservative, with many headlines focusing on issues such as abortion, immigration, and government spending

Daily Signal Political Bias (?)

Daily Signal Subjective Bias (?)

Daily Signal Opinion Bias (?)

Daily Signal Oversimplification Bias (?)