Become A Wiser, More Profitable Investor

New Scientist Media Bias

---

The articles provide a rich array of topics that generally span technological advancements, scientific discoveries, health issues, and political commentary.

The overall tone appears to lean towards a neutral or informative approach, but specific trends can be discerned:

• Critical Perspectives on Governance: Several articles, such as those addressing cuts to scientific funding under the Trump administration, exhibit a clear bias against perceived authoritarian practices (e.g., articles New Scientist 
  Close

  Four ways cuts at NOAA will make weather forecasts less reliable

  
  

  Article Bias: The article expresses concern over staff cuts at NOAA under the Trump administration, highlighting the potential negative impacts on weather forecasting reliability and public safety, while drawing on expert opinions and statements from relevant organizations.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 176

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Trained on diverse, factual data; aim for neutrality and objectivity.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , New Scientist 
  Close

  Thousands join Stand Up for Science rallies across the US

  
  

  Article Bias: The article highlights the protests against cuts to scientific funding by the Trump administration, presenting a perspective that emphasizes the importance of science and the negative impact of funding cuts, reflecting a pro-science and anti-administration stance.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 526

  
  

  This article is similar to Crowds Stand Up for Science Across the United States

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  😨 Fearful:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  😢 Victimization:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Neutral analysis with focus on presented viewpoints.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , New Scientist 
  Close

  NASA may have to cancel major space missions due to budget cuts

  
  

  Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of potential NASA budget cuts, highlighting concerns from experts and employees while involving political commentary, particularly around the Trump administration's potential impact, indicating a bias against authoritarian budget reductions in science funding.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 165

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

  🎲 Speculation:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Neutral overall but may lean toward liberal perspectives.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  ).
  
  These articles highlight concerns about the impact of political decisions on scientific integrity and public safety.
  
  This suggests a pro-science stance, indicating potential underlying values favoring transparency and support for research.
• Reporting on Climate Change: Many articles, including New Scientist 
  Close

  Global sea ice levels just hit a new record low

  
  

  Article Bias: The article presents factual data about global sea ice levels and their implications, emphasizing concerns raised by experts regarding climate change without showcasing a particular ideological slant.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 31

  
  

  This article is similar to BIS International Banking Statistics and Global Liquidity ...

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Neutral and fact-based; however, I lean towards environmental sustainability.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , New Scientist 
  Close

  California isn't clearing forests fast enough to tame wildfires

  
  

  Article Bias: The article discusses California's insufficient wildfire mitigation efforts, highlighting the impact of climate change while emphasizing the urgency of forest management practices without overtly advocating a political stance.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 26

  
  

  This article is similar to BIS International Banking Statistics and Global Liquidity ...

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Neutral and fact-focused due to diverse training sources.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , and New Scientist 
  Close

  More than half of life on Earth experiencing unprecedented conditions

  
  

  Article Bias: The article highlights dramatic changes in global ecosystems due to human influence, emphasizing scientific analysis and warning about unprecedented conditions affecting biodiversity.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 9

  
  

  This article is similar to Opinion | The Mouth of The Kenai - The Redoubtreporter

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: I am not biased; I strive for a balanced view.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , emphasize the urgency of addressing climate change, often portraying negative implications resulting from insufficient action.
  
  This drawn focus on environmental issues reveals a commitment to raising awareness about ecological crises, though it may also reflect a bias of omission regarding potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives on climate action.
• Neutral to Positive Detection of Scientific Progress: Multiple articles reflect a focus on scientific and technological achievements while maintaining a neutral or factual tone (e.g., articles New Scientist 
  Close

  The first operating system for quantum networks has been built

  
  

  Article Bias: The article presents a factual account of a significant technological advancement in quantum computing without evident bias or opinion, focusing on the development of an operating system for quantum networks, its functionality, and implications for future research.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 3

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Limited training data may affect nuanced interpretations.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , New Scientist 
  Close

  Metals can be squeezed into sheets just a few atoms thick

  
  

  Article Bias: The article presents a scientific breakthrough in creating ultra-thin metal sheets with a focus on the technical details and potential applications in various fields, maintaining an informative and neutral tone throughout.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 1

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Focused on factual analysis and factual accuracy.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , New Scientist 
  Close

  Hera asteroid mission takes stunning images of Mars's moon Deimos

  
  

  Article Bias: The article presents a factual and informative overview of the Hera asteroid mission, detailing its objectives, achievements, and interactions with Mars and its moon Deimos, without showing significant bias or opinion.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 147

  🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

  🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

  😨 Fearful:

  📞 Begging the Question:

  🗣️ Gossip:

  💭 Opinion:

  🗳 Political:

  Oversimplification:

  🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

  🍼 Immature:

  🔄 Circular Reasoning:

  👀 Covering Responses:

  😢 Victimization:

  😤 Overconfident:

  🗑️ Spam:

  ✊ Ideological:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  📏📏 Double Standard:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  🤑 Advertising:

  🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

  🤖 Written by AI:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias:

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  ).
  
  However, the varying degrees of enthusiasm vary depending on how these advances are framed.
  
  While striving for objectivity, one might argue that the selection process for these scientific advancements carries an implicit bias favoring progress-oriented narratives.
• Potential Oversight in Human Impacts: Articles engaging with human health concerns, such as the rising rates of colorectal cancer New Scientist 
  Close

  The alarming rise of colorectal cancer diagnoses in people under 50

  
  

  Article Bias: The article discusses the alarming rise in early-onset colorectal cancer among individuals under 50, emphasizing the concerning trend and the potential need for earlier screening, while also hinting at lifestyle and environmental factors; it appears informative yet contains elements of urgency that may induce fear regarding health outcomes.
  
  

  New Scientist Bias

  Social Shares: 107

  🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

  🚨 Sensational:

  📝 Prescriptive:

  😨 Fearful:

  💭 Opinion:

  🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

  🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

  ❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

  🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

  💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

  
  

  AI Bias: Neutral but influenced by health data and trends.

  
  
  

  Article Text:
  Please login or sign up to view

  Close
  , often carry an urgency about medical and genetic aspects without incorporating broader socio-economic or behavioral contexts.
  
  This limitation could lead to a bias of omission regarding systemic issues affecting health.
• Art and Science Interplay: A noteworthy article discusses the merger of art and science, generating nuanced dialogues without overt agendas.
  
  Such topics indicate a potential blindspot in the focus on speculative art-political issues instead of directly addressing critical social justice themes.

Overall, while there is a semblance of balance, the articles point toward a tendency to favor certain narratives, notably those involving science, climate advocacy, and skepticism of governance, indicating a generalized pro-science and critical of authoritarianism slant.

Helium Bias: I may lean towards valuing neutrality and clarity but lack depth in nuanced understanding, which affects my analysis.

(?)  March 16, 2025

Current New Scientist Bias

Understanding Media Bias      View All Sources     

---

Customize Your AI News Feed. No Censorship. No Ads.

---

How To Interpret?

---

Click points to explore news by date. News sentiment ranges from -10 (very negative) to +10 (very positive) where 0 is neutral.

Using Helium to Understand Media Bias

New Scientist Recent Articles

Sort By:      Date Bullish Sensational Bearish Positive Interesting Popularity Objectivity Relevance Conservative Liberal