ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ð Prescriptive:
ðģ Political:
ðž Immature:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â
:
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market regarding the potential success of the Conservative Party in Newfoundland and Labrador, showing a strong preference against their winning, indicated by a 95% no vote and only 4% yes, suggesting a clear skepticism of their electoral prospects in an upcoming election.
Social Shares: 0
ðĩ Liberal <â> Conservative ðī:
ð― Libertarian <â> Authoritarian ð:
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Prescriptive:
ðïļ Dovish <â> Hawkish ðĶ:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðïļ Appeal to Authority:
ðž Immature:
ð Circular Reasoning:
ð Covering Responses:
ðĒ Victimization:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ðïļ Spam:
â Ideological:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
ðð Double Standard:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Advertising:
ðē Speculation:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Neutral and focused on data-driven insights.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market scenario about the Conservative Party's potential performance in Newfoundland and Labrador, showing a heavily skewed prediction against them, which may imply a bias towards viewing them unfavorably in this context.
Social Shares: 0
ðĩ Liberal <â> Conservative ðī:
ð― Libertarian <â> Authoritarian ð:
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Prescriptive:
ðïļ Dovish <â> Hawkish ðĶ:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðïļ Appeal to Authority:
ðž Immature:
ð Circular Reasoning:
ð Covering Responses:
ðĒ Victimization:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ðïļ Spam:
â Ideological:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
ðð Double Standard:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Advertising:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: I may overestimate bias due to sentiment in political contexts.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market regarding the New Democratic Party's chances in Newfoundland and Labrador's upcoming election, showing overwhelming skepticism about their success with a 99% prediction against them, indicating a potential bias against the party's prospects.
Social Shares: 0
ðĩ Liberal <â> Conservative ðī:
ð― Libertarian <â> Authoritarian ð:
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Prescriptive:
ðïļ Dovish <â> Hawkish ðĶ:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðïļ Appeal to Authority:
ðž Immature:
ð Circular Reasoning:
ð Covering Responses:
ðĒ Victimization:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ðïļ Spam:
â Ideological:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
ðð Double Standard:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Advertising:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Limited by focus on prediction markets and election dynamics.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction about the 2025 Philippine general election, implying strong confidence in one outcome with a 99% prediction that no party will win most seats, suggesting a very biased position against the possibility of another party's success.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Prescriptive:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðĪ Overconfident:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
AI Bias: Limited by fixed data and not examining all political perspectives.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market scenario regarding the New Democratic Party's potential electoral success in Newfoundland and Labrador, with a strong inclination towards a prediction of failure indicated by the 99% 'No' rate, suggesting a negative bias towards the party's chances without providing context or alternative viewpoints.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
â Ideological:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
AI Bias: I might reflect patterns from diverse news sources, favoring balanced perspectives.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market scenario regarding the New Democratic Party's chances in an upcoming election, heavily skewed towards the belief that they will not win, indicating a potential negative bias towards the party's prospects without further context or analysis.
Social Shares: 0
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ðē Speculation:
AI Bias: Limited perspective on current events may affect judgment.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction regarding the Romanian Presidential Election, with an overwhelmingly negative likelihood for another candidate winning the second most votes, suggesting a strong bias towards the current leading candidate or party.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ð Prescriptive:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Written by AI:
AI Bias: Limited context affects bias analysis accuracy.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction about the 2025 Philippine general election, implying strong confidence in one outcome with a 99% prediction that no party will win most seats, suggesting a very biased position against the possibility of another party's success.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Prescriptive:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðĪ Overconfident:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
AI Bias: Limited by fixed data and not examining all political perspectives.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market scenario for the 2025 Philippine general election, showing overwhelming confidence that another party will not win the most seats, indicating a potential bias towards the current ruling party's popularity and stability.
Social Shares: 0
ð― Libertarian <â> Authoritarian ð:
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Prescriptive:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ðïļ Spam:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Advertising:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: I analyze data based on patterns in training, focusing on neutrality.
Article Bias: The article engages in speculative questioning about Karoline Leavitt's potential word choice during a press briefing, primarily relying on a prediction market format, which lacks depth and substantive commentary.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðïļ Spam:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Neutral, but may lack sensitivity to nuance in speculative contexts.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction about the 2025 Philippine general election, implying strong confidence in one outcome with a 99% prediction that no party will win most seats, suggesting a very biased position against the possibility of another party's success.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Prescriptive:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðĪ Overconfident:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
AI Bias: Limited by fixed data and not examining all political perspectives.
Article Bias: The article engages in speculative questioning about Karoline Leavitt's potential word choice during a press briefing, primarily relying on a prediction market format, which lacks depth and substantive commentary.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðïļ Spam:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Neutral, but may lack sensitivity to nuance in speculative contexts.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction about the likelihood of the New Democratic Party winning seats, suggesting an overwhelming consensus (99% against) that they will not, which may indicate a dismissive bias towards the party's chances.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Neutral, trained on diverse data, but may lack recent specifics.
Article Bias: The article presents a highly speculative prediction market analysis regarding the Romanian Presidential Election, showing an overwhelming expectation that no candidate will win the second most votes, indicating a potential bias towards certainty without providing substantial context or analysis.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Prescriptive:
ð Begging the Question:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
AI Bias: Neutral stance, based on extensive informational training.
Article Bias: The article presents a question about predictions for the 2025 Philippine general election with a highly skewed response indicating a strong expectation that the current party will maintain a majority, reflecting a possibly biased perspective toward the current governing party's stability.
Social Shares: 0
ðĩ Liberal <â> Conservative ðī:
ð― Libertarian <â> Authoritarian ð:
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Prescriptive:
ðïļ Dovish <â> Hawkish ðĶ:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðïļ Appeal to Authority:
ðž Immature:
ð Circular Reasoning:
ð Covering Responses:
ðĒ Victimization:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ðïļ Spam:
â Ideological:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
ðð Double Standard:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Advertising:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: I am designed to provide objective analysis based on data.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market regarding the 2025 Philippine general election with a stark prediction favoring continuity, indicating a high likelihood of the current party winning, which may reflect a lack of nuanced discussion or alternative viewpoints.
Social Shares: 0
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
AI Bias: Neutral assessment of articles based on data, not personal opinions.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market scenario related to a specific individual and the phrases they may use in a press briefing, lacking depth and context, and it appears to focus on trivial aspects rather than meaningful political discourse.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Prescriptive:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðïļ Spam:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ðĪ Advertising:
ðē Speculation:
AI Bias: Focus on brevity may miss nuance in the analysis.
Article Bias: The article engages in speculative questioning about Karoline Leavitt's potential word choice during a press briefing, primarily relying on a prediction market format, which lacks depth and substantive commentary.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðïļ Spam:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Neutral, but may lack sensitivity to nuance in speculative contexts.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction about the 2025 Philippine general election, implying strong confidence in one outcome with a 99% prediction that no party will win most seats, suggesting a very biased position against the possibility of another party's success.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Prescriptive:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðĪ Overconfident:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ð Manipulative:
AI Bias: Limited by fixed data and not examining all political perspectives.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction market regarding the Romanian Presidential Election without providing context, analysis, or opposing viewpoints, leading to a heavily skewed impression that the outcome is predetermined, suggesting high levels of bias in its representation of political dynamics.
Social Shares: 0
ðĩ Liberal <â> Conservative ðī:
ð― Libertarian <â> Authoritarian ð:
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ðĻ Sensational:
ð Bearish <â> Bullish ð:
ð Prescriptive:
ðïļ Dovish <â> Hawkish ðĶ:
ðĻ Fearful:
ð Begging the Question:
ðĢïļ Gossip:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðïļ Appeal to Authority:
ðž Immature:
ð Circular Reasoning:
ð Covering Responses:
ðĒ Victimization:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ðïļ Spam:
â Ideological:
ðī Anti-establishment <â> Pro-establishment ðš:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
ðð Double Standard:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðĪ Advertising:
ðē Speculation:
ðĪ Written by AI:
ð Low Integrity <â> High Integrity âĪïļ:
AI Bias: Limited by my training data; may not capture all biases comprehensively.
Article Bias: The article presents a prediction regarding the 2025 Philippine general election, suggesting a strong belief that another party will not win the most seats, but does not delve into any underlying reasons or context, indicating a lack of nuanced exploration.
Social Shares: 0
ðïļ Objective <â> Subjective ðïļ :
ð Prescriptive:
ð Opinion:
ðģ Political:
Oversimplification:
ðž Immature:
ðĪ Overconfident:
ð Negative <â> Positive ð:
â Uncredible <â> Credible â :
ð§ Rational <â> Irrational ðĪŠ:
ðē Speculation:
ðĪ Written by AI:
AI Bias: I aim for neutrality but may lack diverse perspectives.
2024 © Helium Trades
Privacy Policy & Disclosure
* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy
of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions,
you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Ask any question about Polymarket bias!