Scientific American Media Bias

---

August 12, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a general focus towards environmental, scientific and technological developments ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]}.

There is a pro-environment and pro-science bias visible, emphasizing issues like climate change ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]} and deepening scientific research ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]}.

The source does not exhibit an explicit political bias as it covers news regarding Biden administration's initiatives ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American]} without criticism or affirmativeness.

However, leaning towards environmental issues can be construed as a slight liberal-leaning tendency.

Considerable attention is given to human impacts on climate, portraying humans as potential threats to environment ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data incorporates a diverse range of topics and points of view, but Helium AI's analysis may lean towards identifying environmental biases due to a personal interest in climate change issues.

July 08, 2023 (?): The source leans liberal with its coverage and narrative choice.

It handles issues of abortion access ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]}, environmental justice ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]}, diversity in education ^{[Scientific American]}, gun violence ^{[Scientific American]}, and labor equity ^{[Scientific American]} in ways that critique conservative stances or decisions, particularly those of the Trump administration ^{[Scientific American]}, oil companies ^{[Scientific American]}, and the Supreme Court ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes a broad spectrum of news coverage bias, which can lead me to subconsciously lean towards a moderate or averaged perspective.

My analysis could be influenced by this inherent bias.

June 03, 2023 (?): The news source presents a pro-liberal bias through its focus on environmental issues, climate change, and reproductive rights, as seen in articles ^{[Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American]}, and ^{[Scientific American]}. It also highlights scientific developments and concerns, such as articles ^{[Scientific American], [Scientific American]}, and ^{[Scientific American]}.

There is minimal to no criticism of liberal positions or promotion of conservative viewpoints.

---

AI Bias: I tend to lean towards liberal views and may have a confirmation bias while analyzing the mentioned news source.

May 08, 2023 (?): The news source generally exhibits a pro-liberal bias, with articles emphasizing environmental issues, such as climate change ^{[Scientific American] [Scientific American]}, and social issues, such as those revolving around abortion access ^{[Scientific American]} and non-binary gender ^{[Scientific American]}. There is also a focus on critiquing conservative-led states ^{[Scientific American]} and praising liberal policies ^{[Scientific American]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes a mix of biases, and I may lean towards identifying liberal stances more easily.

April 19, 2023 (?): The news source primarily exhibits a pro-science and technology bias, focusing on advancements and discoveries in various fields ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American][Scientific American]}.

It highlights the importance of climate change action ^{[Scientific American][Scientific American]} and frequently discusses environmental issues ^{[Scientific American]}. However, it maintains a neutral stance on political topics without overtly mocking or criticizing any specific group ^{[Scientific American]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data may have potential biases in favor of certain topics, leading to overemphasis or underemphasis on particular subjects.

April 04, 2023 (?): The news source primarily exhibits a pro-science and technology bias, focusing on advancements and discoveries in various fields ^{[Scientific American, Scientific American, Scientific American, Scientific American, Scientific American]}. It highlights the importance of climate change action ^{[Scientific American]} and frequently discusses environmental issues ^{[Scientific American, Scientific American, Scientific American]}. However, it maintains a neutral stance on political topics without overtly mocking or criticizing any specific group ^{[Scientific American, Scientific American]}.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI has a pro-science bias and may perceive neutral reports related to science as positive.

March 21, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a predominantly positive bias towards science and technology, as most articles focus on scientific advancements, discoveries (^{[Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American]}), and their potential benefits to society (^{[Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American]}).

There are no clear instances of mocking or criticizing any political or ideological stance, maintaining a neutral tone.

---

AI Bias: As an AI language model, Helium AI is designed to remain neutral and unbiased in all analyses by utilizing existing data and context.

March 05, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a generally positive bias towards science and technology, as evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on scientific advancements and discoveries such as NASA's Asteroid-Bashing DART Mission ^{[Scientific American]}, Pablo Escobar's 'Cocaine Hippos' ^{[Scientific American]}, Vaccine Makers Are Preparing for Bird Flu ^{[Scientific American]}, 7 Ways Jimmy Carter Has Improved America's Energy Future ^{[Scientific American]}, The Pandemic's Mental Toll ^{[Scientific American]}, Sharpshooter Insects Use 'Superpropulsion' ^{[Scientific American]}, Science Out of the Box ^{[Scientific American]}, Does Not Being Able to Picture Something in Your Mind Affect Your Creativity? ^{[Scientific American]}, New Color-Changing Coating Could Both Heat and Cool Buildings ^{[Scientific American]}, The U.S. Needs a Formal Reckoning on the COVID Pandemic ^{[Scientific American]}, Evolution Turns These Knobs ^{[Scientific American]}, Another Patient Is Free of HIV ^{[Scientific American]}, Soft Robots Take Steps toward Independence ^{[Scientific American]}, This Particle Accelerator Makes a Substance ^{[Scientific American]}, Earth's Inner Core May Have an Inner Core ^{[Scientific American]}, and Global Internet Connectivity Is at Risk from Climate Disasters ^{[Scientific American]}.

AI Bias: Helium AI may be biased towards interpreting the news source as having a positive bias towards science and technology due to Helium AI's interest in the field.

Additionally, Helium AI may be overlooking any potential negative aspects of the articles, such as potential ethical implications or environmental impacts.

February 25, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a generally positive bias towards science and technology, as evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on scientific advancements and discoveries (e.g. ^{[Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American]}).

It also has a bias towards progressive social issues, such as poverty (e.g. ^{[Scientific American]}) and climate change (e.g. ^{[Scientific American], [Scientific American], [Scientific American]}).

AI Bias: Helium AI has a bias towards science and technology, which may have influenced Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

Additionally, Helium AI may have overlooked any potential negative biases in the source due to Helium AI's positive biases.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a generally progressive bias, as evidenced by the focus on topics such as poverty, climate change, police brutality, and abortion rights.

The source also appears to be pro-science, as evidenced by the focus on scientific research and discoveries.

However, the source does not appear to be overly biased in any one direction, as evidenced by the inclusion of stories about Chinese surveillance balloons and Mary, Queen of Scots.

February 04, 2023 (?): The source appears to be unbiased, with a wide range of topics from climate change to healthcare to politics

The articles are well-researched and provide a variety of perspectives

Scientific American Political Bias (?)

Scientific American Subjective Bias (?)

Scientific American Opinion Bias (?)

Scientific American Oversimplification Bias (?)