Transparent Machine Learning Stocks + Digital Assets Forecasts*
If you don't make over $60 your first month, get your money back.
Become a more profitable investor with our transparent AI stock forecasts.
Increase your awareness with intelligent & balanced business news feed.
Stay on top with forecast models models trained, tested, and updated every day.
The news feed designed to reduce addiction and increase your understanding.
We will never sell, rent, or give your personal information away under any circumstance.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
The blue line is Helium's historical forecast. The black line is the actual closing price. Full transparency of past predictions. Hover over points for more information. Video Tutorial.
Future Price Cone
The future price cone means the model thinks there is a 80% chance the price will land within the bounds of the cone. A blue cone is neutral, a green cone is bullish, and a red cone is bearish.
Model Correlation
Higher (closer to 1) means a more accurate model and lower (closer to -1) means a less accurate model. This is the Spearman Correlation between model predicted percent change and actual percent change calculated over the last 150 days.
Percent Correct (up or down)
This is the percent of the time our models predicted the correct direction of the price (either up or down) over the last 150 days.
Tip:
Left click and drag charts to zoom in. Right click to zoom back out.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Helium Summary:
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that the state's pre-statehood abortion ban, dating from 1864, is enforceable [robertreich.substack.com][CBS]. This ruling affects the legality of abortion procedures in Arizona, triggering varied responses from political figures and activists, with particular focus on the law's lack of exceptions for rape or incest and criminal implications for healthcare providers [robertreich.substack.com]. The Democratic Attorney General has stated she will not prosecute under the law, adding complexity to its enforcement [Fortune].
April 12, 2024
Evidence
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that a pre-statehood abortion law from 1864 is enforceable, creating a legal precedent for nearly complete abortion bans [robertreich.substack.com].
Arizona's Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes stated she will not prosecute doctors under the 1864 law, affirming support for reproductive rights despite the ruling [CBS].
Perspectives
Republican Perspective
Some Republicans, anticipating political fallout and voter backlash, have swiftly denounced Arizona's near-total abortion ban despite having previously supported strict abortion laws, marking a contentious moment for the GOP as it navigates this divisive issue [The Guardian][The Independent].
Democratic Perspective
Democrats, spearheaded by Arizona's Democratic Governor and Attorney General, have criticized the law as extreme, dangerous, and an infringement on women's rights, and they are advocating for repeal and working to put a pro-choice amendment on the November ballot [robertreich.substack.com][CBS].
Legal Analyst Perspective
Legal analysts are examining this ruling in the broader context of the ongoing national debate on reproductive rights. They highlight its potential to pose serious challenges to healthcare providers and to affect the wider region, which serves as a haven for those seeking abortions from states with more restrictive laws [CBS][robertreich.substack.com].
Q&A
What does the Arizona 1864 abortion ban entail?
The Arizona 1864 abortion ban criminalizes abortions except to save the life of the mother, with no exceptions for rape or incest, leading to potential criminal prosecution for healthcare providers performing abortions [robertreich.substack.com][CBS]. How are political figures responding to the ruling?
Responses vary, with some Republican figures who previously supported strict abortion laws now opposing the ban, while Democrats criticize the law's extremity and aim to bolster reproductive rights through legislative action and potential ballot measures [The Guardian][robertreich.substack.com].
Coverage of the Arizona abortion ban demonstrates a range of biases.
Conservative outlets emphasize the law's alignment with pro-life values while liberal sources focus on women's autonomy and health rights, with each selecting evidence and narratives that support their ideological stance.
Social Media Perspectives
The reaction to the Arizona Supreme Court upholding a 1864 abortion ban evokes a spectrum of emotions and positions.
Criticism emerges from those who perceive this decision as a step backward, encapsulating feelings of frustration and determination to continue the fight for reproductive rights.
Contrastingly, there are voices within the Republican sphere showing dissonance with abortion bans.
The focus on the legislative and political maneuvers surrounding this issue, from federal to state levels, hints at a complex battlefield of ideologies, personal rights, and political strategies, all underpinned by a deep sense of urgency and contention among the populace.
Context
The ruling occurs against the backdrop of a reshaped U.S. judicial landscape concerning abortion rights following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision. It, therefore, becomes a flashpoint in the national debate over reproductive freedoms, highlighting the ongoing tension between state sovereignty in legislating abortion and individual rights.
Takeaway
The court's decision to uphold the 1864 abortion ban reflects the political and judicial complexities following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, demonstrating the varying approaches to abortion laws among U.S. states and the deep divisions within American politics regarding reproductive rights.
Potential Outcomes
The ruling can accelerate efforts to place a pro-choice amendment on the Arizona ballot with a high likelihood of passing, creating a legal contradiction to the enforced ban .
The state legislature could intervene, leading to new legislation that either aligns with or counters the court ruling, though the probability of such legislative action is uncertain given the political divisiveness on the issue .
* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy
of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions,
you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.