Transparent Machine Learning Stocks + Digital Assets Forecasts*
If you don't make over $60 your first month, get your money back.
Become a more profitable investor with our transparent AI stock forecasts.
Increase your awareness with intelligent & balanced business news feed.
Stay on top with forecast models models trained, tested, and updated every day.
The news feed designed to reduce addiction and increase your understanding.
We will never sell, rent, or give your personal information away under any circumstance.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
The blue line is Helium's historical forecast. The black line is the actual closing price. Full transparency of past predictions. Hover over points for more information. Video Tutorial.
Future Price Cone
The future price cone means the model thinks there is a 80% chance the price will land within the bounds of the cone. A blue cone is neutral, a green cone is bullish, and a red cone is bearish.
Model Correlation
Higher (closer to 1) means a more accurate model and lower (closer to -1) means a less accurate model. This is the Spearman Correlation between model predicted percent change and actual percent change calculated over the last 150 days.
Percent Correct (up or down)
This is the percent of the time our models predicted the correct direction of the price (either up or down) over the last 150 days.
Tip:
Left click and drag charts to zoom in. Right click to zoom back out.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Helium Summary:
The U.S. Department of Justice, along with 16 state's attorneys general, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging that the company has maintained an illegal monopoly over smartphones, stifling innovation and harms consumer choice.
The lawsuit targets Apple's practices, including restrictions it places on iMessage, Apple Wallet, and its overall app ecosystem, which regulators argue lock consumers into Apple's products while excluding competitive technologies [Vox][CBS][LA Times].
March 24, 2024
Evidence
DOJ's antitrust lawsuit alleges Apple's market control harms innovation [Vox].
Apple argues the lawsuit threatens its principles and integration quality [Yahoo].
Perspectives
Legal Expert Perspective
Legal experts suggest that it's difficult for the government to win antitrust cases but note that the DOJ's case against Apple appears relatively solid, compared to other recent lawsuits [ecns.cn].
Apple's Perspective
Apple contends the lawsuit is baseless, emphasizing its commitment to user privacy, security, and the seamless integration of its services as justifications for its ecosystem's exclusivity [Yahoo].
Consumer Advocate Perspective
Consumer advocates may argue that Apple's ecosystem limits choice and innovation, potentially leading to higher consumer costs and less competitive markets [Common Dreams].
It alleges Apple employs monopolistic practices to stifle competition and innovation, locking consumers to its products [LA Times]. What is Apple's response?
Apple refutes the lawsuit, asserting they prioritize security, and the seamless integration of their services [Business Insider].
Sources like Wired and The Verge provide detail while maintaining a neutral tone.
However, there's potential for sensationalism given the high-profile nature of the case which could affect reader perception [Wired][The Verge].
Social Media Perspectives
The sentiment around the "DOJ sues Apple for monopoly" topic showcases a variety of perspectives and emotions.
Some individuals express support for the DOJ's action, viewing it as a necessary step towards ensuring free competition and breaking down perceived gatekeeping behaviors by Apple.
They advocate for the right of developers to distribute their software without Apple's interference, cheering on the EU's efforts to mandate such changes.
Conversely, there are voices of skepticism and frustration, implicitly or explicitly criticizing governmental actions, including those of the DOJ, as overreach or politically motivated weaponization.
These contrasting views underline the complex discourse around tech monopolies, legal interventions, and the broader implications for market freedom and innovation.
Context
Considering the complexities of antitrust legislation and historical cases like United States v. Microsoft Corp, the outcome could set new precedents .
Takeaway
The DOJ's lawsuit highlights ongoing debates about market dominance and consumer choice in the digital age. It underscores the tension between maintaining a cohesive product ecosystem and fostering competitive, open markets.
Potential Outcomes
Apple's defense prevails, maintaining the status quo, 40% probability, based on historical difficulty of winning antitrust cases .
DOJ wins, leading to significant changes in Apple's business practices, 60% probability, considering recent government focus on tech antitrust enforcement .
* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy
of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions,
you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Ask any question about this page!
