Asteroid 2024 YR4 impact risk is now extremely low due to data improvements | Helium Trades

United States Tech Markets Politics Business Science Memes

Asteroid 2024 YR4's Earth impact risk is now negligible

Source: https://www.livescience.com/space/asteroids/asteroid-yr4-impact-odds-plummet-as-nasa-changes-threat-level-of-city-killer

Source: https://www.livescience.com/space/asteroids/asteroid-yr4-impact-odds-plummet-as-nasa-changes-threat-level-of-city-killer

Helium Summary: Asteroid 2024 YR4, initially posing a significant impact threat, has its probability of colliding with Earth drastically reduced to near zero, largely due to enhanced telescope observations and orbital recalculations.

Previously, the chance of an impact was estimated at up to 3.1%

Asteroid YR4 impact odds plummet as NASA changes threat level of 'city-killer'

Article Bias: The article presents a factual update on NASA's change in threat levels regarding the asteroid YR4, providing clear data and context while maintaining a neutral tone, leading to a very low bias overall.

Live Science Bias

Social Shares: 124

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific bias; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Findings now peg this at 0.0017%

Chance of giant asteroid hitting Earth in 2032 falls to 0.0017%

Article Bias: The article provides a balanced overview of asteroid 2024 YR4, emphasizing the reduction in risk of impact and highlighting the advancements in technology that allow for better tracking and early warning systems, without creating undue fear.

The Guardian Bias

Social Shares: 389

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited perspective from pre-2023 data may affect analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

, shifting concern from Earth to the Moon, which carries a slightly higher risk.

This update alleviates public fear, criticized as exaggerated by some

Why NASA keeps changing the probability of an asteroid impacting Earth in 2032

Article Bias: The article objectively analyzes the fluctuating probabilities assigned to asteroid 2024 YR4's potential impact, emphasizing how sensational media portrayals, particularly the term 'city killer', misrepresent NASA's real findings, which indicate a very low risk of impact.

It critically examines the resulting misinformation while providing detailed context and official statements from relevant agencies.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No significant biases are recognized in data or NLP models.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

, emphasizing the importance of precise tracking and sustained monitoring

Asteroid 2024 YR4 To 'Safely' Pass Earth In 2032, Says NASA; New Warning For Moon

Article Bias: The article provides a factual report on asteroid 2024 YR4's projected trajectory, primarily emphasizing NASA's updates and calculations regarding its impact probabilities, with minimal opinion or sensationalism present.

ndtvprofit.com Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited by training data; some bias towards factfulness.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

February 28, 2025

Evidence

NASA lowered YR4 impact probability to 0.004% due to precise recalculations

Asteroid 2024 YR4 no longer poses significant threat to Earth, NASA says

Article Bias: The article conveys a neutral and factual update from NASA regarding the asteroid 2024 YR4, detailing its reduced threat level to Earth while maintaining a focus on scientific observations and calculations without sensationalism.

CBS Bias

Social Shares: 183

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Objective and neutral, as trained on scientific and factual sources.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

ESA reported a dramatic drop in collision risk after enhanced observations

As expected, the threat from Asteroid 2024 YR4 has essentially dropped to zero

Article Bias: The article reports on the status of Asteroid 2024 YR4, describing how its threat to Earth has significantly diminished through ongoing observations and analysis, while also emphasizing the importance of monitoring such near-Earth objects for potential risks, maintaining a factual and scientific tone throughout.

Phys Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I aim to provide neutral, factual information without personal bias.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Perspectives

Scientific Community

The scientific community, including NASA and ESA, stresses accurate data acquisition, reducing panic through precise orbital calculations

Chance of giant asteroid hitting Earth in 2032 falls to 0.0017%

Article Bias: The article provides a balanced overview of asteroid 2024 YR4, emphasizing the reduction in risk of impact and highlighting the advancements in technology that allow for better tracking and early warning systems, without creating undue fear.

The Guardian Bias

Social Shares: 389

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited perspective from pre-2023 data may affect analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Asteroid YR4 impact odds plummet as NASA changes threat level of 'city-killer'

Article Bias: The article presents a factual update on NASA's change in threat levels regarding the asteroid YR4, providing clear data and context while maintaining a neutral tone, leading to a very low bias overall.

Live Science Bias

Social Shares: 124

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific bias; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. They highlight the effectiveness of current monitoring systems.

Helium Bias

I utilize extensive data on astronomy and risk always emphasizing objective scientific evaluation, potentially underestimating lay public interest or media influence.

Story Blindspots

The narrative underplays future potential risks of similar events and neglects engagement strategies for non-scientific communities about asteroid risks.

Q&A

What caused the initial panic regarding Asteroid 2024 YR4?

The initial panic arose from media headlines labeling it a "city killer" due to a 3.1% impact chance, the highest recorded for a sizable asteroid

Why NASA keeps changing the probability of an asteroid impacting Earth in 2032

Article Bias: The article objectively analyzes the fluctuating probabilities assigned to asteroid 2024 YR4's potential impact, emphasizing how sensational media portrayals, particularly the term 'city killer', misrepresent NASA's real findings, which indicate a very low risk of impact. It critically examines the resulting misinformation while providing detailed context and official statements from relevant agencies.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No significant biases are recognized in data or NLP models.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

How did NASA manage to reduce impact probabilities?

NASA used enhanced telescope observations to refine the asteroid’s trajectory, resulting in a significant reduction in impact likelihood

Chance of giant asteroid hitting Earth in 2032 falls to 0.0017%

Article Bias: The article provides a balanced overview of asteroid 2024 YR4, emphasizing the reduction in risk of impact and highlighting the advancements in technology that allow for better tracking and early warning systems, without creating undue fear.

The Guardian Bias

Social Shares: 389

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited perspective from pre-2023 data may affect analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Asteroid YR4 impact odds plummet as NASA changes threat level of 'city-killer'

Article Bias: The article presents a factual update on NASA's change in threat levels regarding the asteroid YR4, providing clear data and context while maintaining a neutral tone, leading to a very low bias overall.

Live Science Bias

Social Shares: 124

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific bias; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Narratives + Biases (?)

The primary narratives center around Asteroid 2024 YR4's threat to Earth and subsequent recalibration of risks.

NASA reports and ESA data painted a picture of fluctuating probabilities before ultimately deeming the risk negligible

Asteroid YR4 impact odds plummet as NASA changes threat level of 'city-killer'

Article Bias: The article presents a factual update on NASA's change in threat levels regarding the asteroid YR4, providing clear data and context while maintaining a neutral tone, leading to a very low bias overall.

Live Science Bias

Social Shares: 124

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific bias; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Chance of giant asteroid hitting Earth in 2032 falls to 0.0017%

Article Bias: The article provides a balanced overview of asteroid 2024 YR4, emphasizing the reduction in risk of impact and highlighting the advancements in technology that allow for better tracking and early warning systems, without creating undue fear.

The Guardian Bias

Social Shares: 389

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited perspective from pre-2023 data may affect analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Critics of media sensationalism argue that terms like "city killer" inflated public fear

Why NASA keeps changing the probability of an asteroid impacting Earth in 2032

Article Bias: The article objectively analyzes the fluctuating probabilities assigned to asteroid 2024 YR4's potential impact, emphasizing how sensational media portrayals, particularly the term 'city killer', misrepresent NASA's real findings, which indicate a very low risk of impact.

It critically examines the resulting misinformation while providing detailed context and official statements from relevant agencies.

Snopes Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No significant biases are recognized in data or NLP models.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Sources like Ars Technica and HumanProgress maintain a focus on the scientific process.

Media outlets often focus on attention-grabbing headlines without contextual scientific backing, highlighting the disconnect between scientific reports and public interpretation.

Collaborative efforts between space agencies emphasize transparency and continuous monitoring's role in risk management.

Social Media Perspectives

The sentiment around asteroid 2024 YR4 on social media is a tapestry of intrigue, concern, and curiosity. Many users express a sense of awe at the vastness of space, with posts highlighting the beauty and mystery of celestial events. There's a palpable undercurrent of anxiety, with some individuals voicing fears about potential impacts, though these are often tempered by reassurances from others citing scientific data indicating no threat. Discussions often delve into the science of asteroid tracking, with users sharing educational content about how such objects are monitored. Humor also finds its place, with memes and light-hearted jests about preparing for an unlikely doomsday scenario. A segment of the community expresses skepticism towards official statements, seeking more transparency or questioning the accuracy of predictions. Overall, the conversation oscillates between fascination with the cosmos and a cautious, yet hopeful, engagement with the science behind asteroid surveillance.

Context

Asteroid 2024 YR4 was monitored after initial impact probability estimates increased public concern, which later diminished thanks to ESA/NASA's observational updates. The case accentuates the careful line between science reporting and public perception management, modulated by evolving data from global observatories.

Takeaway

The case of asteroid 2024 YR4 shows the importance of rigorous scientific observation and data analysis in calming societal fears about space risks. Improved monitoring technologies significantly reduce perceived threat levels and highlight the effectiveness of established prediction protocols.

Potential Outcomes

Asteroid 2024 YR4 continues on a safe trajectory with a 98% chance, as determined by current data . New measurements would need to drastically alter this assessment for impact predictions.

Increased public trust in scientific measures as precise data prediction reduces unfounded fears . This depends on effective science communication.

Deepen Your Understanding

What can media do to better report scientific findings?

How can tracking technologies further improve asteroid threat management?

Discussion:

Popular Stories

Frequent aviation accidents spark safety concerns among travelers

Recent aviation incidents raise safety concerns and fuel public anxiety.

February 27, 2025

Rwanda-backed M23 rebels accused of serious human rights violations

Rwanda-backed M23 rebels commit severe human rights abuses in eastern Congo.

February 25, 2025

Pope Francis in critical condition with early kidney failure

Pope Francis in critical health with early kidney failure amid pneumonia treatment.

February 26, 2025

Balanced News:

Sort By:

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship.

Market Forecasts

Bullish / Bearish

Digital Assets / Most Accurate

Trading Strategies

Long Volatility

Short Volatility

Balanced News

Balanced News / Sources

Tech / Memes / Politics

About

About / Pricing / Forum

Contact Helium Trades

2024 © Helium Trades
Privacy Policy & Disclosure

* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.