New technologies and ocean studies enhance carbon capture understanding and effectiveness | Helium Trades

United States Tech Markets Politics Business Science Memes

Recent studies enhance understanding of carbon capture and ocean interactions

Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/91214898/carbon-removal-industry-requesting-federal-regulations-itself

Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/91214898/carbon-removal-industry-requesting-federal-regulations-itself

Helium Summary: Recent advancements in carbon capture technologies emphasize their vital role in addressing climate change.

A new covalent organic framework (COF) developed at UC Berkeley displays exceptional efficacy in capturing CO2, including from ambient air, without degradation from moisture, representing a significant advancement in direct air capture (DAC) technology

Capturing carbon from the air just got easier

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific breakthrough in carbon capture technology with a balanced overview of its significance, efficiency, and potential applications, highlighting expert opinions and avoiding unnecessary sensationalism or political framing.

Science Daily Bias

Social Shares: 12

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral approach to scientific analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Carbon dioxide capture from open air using covalent organic frameworks

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific advancement in carbon dioxide capture through a new covalent organic framework, emphasizing its effectiveness and potential in addressing climate change with a neutral tone, focusing on research findings without apparent bias toward political or ideological perspectives.

NCBI Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral training on scientific literature influences responses.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Concurrently, research from the University of Exeter highlights how subtle temperature differences at the ocean surface improve carbon dioxide absorption, suggesting that global oceans have been absorbing more CO2 than previously understood—an increase of approximately 7% annually

Sliver of cool surface water helps the ocean absorb more carbon, study shows

Article Bias: The article presents a recent scientific study on ocean carbon absorption in a clear and informative manner, emphasizing its importance for climate understanding without overtly political framing, suggesting a balanced view on climate science.

Phys Bias

Social Shares: 182

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and fact-based, focused on scientific presentation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. These developments align with the carbon removal industry’s push for federal regulations aimed at ensuring transparency and efficacy in carbon capture methods, reflecting broader environmental and regulatory concerns amid escalating climate impacts

Why the carbon removal industry is requesting federal regulations on itself

Article Bias: The article discusses the carbon removal industry’s calls for regulation amidst significant federal investment, highlighting both the industry's transparency concerns and critical perspectives on carbon removal technologies, resulting in a balanced examination of the topic.

Fast Company Bias

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and algorithmically driven, limited to data up to Oct 2023.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

October 27, 2024

Evidence

COF technology captures CO2 efficiently, enhancing direct air capture methods

Capturing carbon from the air just got easier

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific breakthrough in carbon capture technology with a balanced overview of its significance, efficiency, and potential applications, highlighting expert opinions and avoiding unnecessary sensationalism or political framing.

Science Daily Bias

Social Shares: 12

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral approach to scientific analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Ocean temperature differences increase CO2 absorption significantly

Sliver of cool surface water helps the ocean absorb more carbon, study shows

Article Bias: The article presents a recent scientific study on ocean carbon absorption in a clear and informative manner, emphasizing its importance for climate understanding without overtly political framing, suggesting a balanced view on climate science.

Phys Bias

Social Shares: 182

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and fact-based, focused on scientific presentation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Perspectives

Carbon Capture Advocates

Proponents of carbon capture technology argue its necessity in combating climate change, highlighting advancements like COF technology as essential for reducing atmospheric CO2. However, concerns arise regarding the long-term efficacy and costs involved, with experts suggesting that DAC serves as a supplementary rather than primary solution

Why the carbon removal industry is requesting federal regulations on itself

Article Bias: The article discusses the carbon removal industry’s calls for regulation amidst significant federal investment, highlighting both the industry's transparency concerns and critical perspectives on carbon removal technologies, resulting in a balanced examination of the topic.

Fast Company Bias

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and algorithmically driven, limited to data up to Oct 2023.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Capturing carbon from the air just got easier

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific breakthrough in carbon capture technology with a balanced overview of its significance, efficiency, and potential applications, highlighting expert opinions and avoiding unnecessary sensationalism or political framing.

Science Daily Bias

Social Shares: 12

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral approach to scientific analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Environmental Scientists

Many scientists express caution regarding carbon capture solutions, emphasizing prevention over remediation. Some critique direct air capture as potentially enabling continued fossil fuel reliance, a phenomenon termed 'moral hazard'

Why the carbon removal industry is requesting federal regulations on itself

Article Bias: The article discusses the carbon removal industry’s calls for regulation amidst significant federal investment, highlighting both the industry's transparency concerns and critical perspectives on carbon removal technologies, resulting in a balanced examination of the topic.

Fast Company Bias

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and algorithmically driven, limited to data up to Oct 2023.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Sliver of cool surface water helps the ocean absorb more carbon, study shows

Article Bias: The article presents a recent scientific study on ocean carbon absorption in a clear and informative manner, emphasizing its importance for climate understanding without overtly political framing, suggesting a balanced view on climate science.

Phys Bias

Social Shares: 182

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and fact-based, focused on scientific presentation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Additionally, the role of oceans in carbon absorption is significant yet often underrepresented in climate models, creating gaps in policy and research focus

Sliver of cool surface water helps the ocean absorb more carbon, study shows

Article Bias: The article presents a recent scientific study on ocean carbon absorption in a clear and informative manner, emphasizing its importance for climate understanding without overtly political framing, suggesting a balanced view on climate science.

Phys Bias

Social Shares: 182

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and fact-based, focused on scientific presentation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Relevant Trades

[DAC] Danaos

Q&A

What recent advancements have improved carbon capture efficiency?

The development of a new covalent organic framework (COF) has significantly enhanced CO2 capture from ambient air, demonstrating better moisture resistance and lower energy requirements for carbon recovery

Capturing carbon from the air just got easier

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific breakthrough in carbon capture technology with a balanced overview of its significance, efficiency, and potential applications, highlighting expert opinions and avoiding unnecessary sensationalism or political framing.

Science Daily Bias

Social Shares: 12

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral approach to scientific analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Carbon dioxide capture from open air using covalent organic frameworks

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific advancement in carbon dioxide capture through a new covalent organic framework, emphasizing its effectiveness and potential in addressing climate change with a neutral tone, focusing on research findings without apparent bias toward political or ideological perspectives.

NCBI Bias

Social Shares: 0

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral training on scientific literature influences responses.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Narratives + Biases (?)

Current narratives surrounding carbon capture primarily emphasize technological advancements and their potential in combating climate change, as seen in coverage of UC Berkeley's COF development.

There is a significant focus on the technical efficiency of these technologies, yet critiques highlight concerns about economic feasibility and ethical implications, as some argue these innovations might allow continued pollution

Why the carbon removal industry is requesting federal regulations on itself

Article Bias: The article discusses the carbon removal industry’s calls for regulation amidst significant federal investment, highlighting both the industry's transparency concerns and critical perspectives on carbon removal technologies, resulting in a balanced examination of the topic.

Fast Company Bias

Social Shares: 1

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral and algorithmically driven, limited to data up to Oct 2023.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Capturing carbon from the air just got easier

Article Bias: The article presents a scientific breakthrough in carbon capture technology with a balanced overview of its significance, efficiency, and potential applications, highlighting expert opinions and avoiding unnecessary sensationalism or political framing.

Science Daily Bias

Social Shares: 12

🔵 Liberal <-> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <-> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <-> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <-> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <-> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <-> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <-> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <-> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <-> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🔬 Scientific <-> Superstitious 🔮:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <-> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Neutral approach to scientific analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. The ocean's role in carbon absorption is an emerging narrative largely underrepresented in discussions about mitigation strategies.

Sources such as Fast Company and Science Daily offer balanced views but may also reflect an optimistic technological bias, while critiques focus on market dynamics and policy effectiveness.

This complex landscape underscores the need for nuanced discussions about both technological progress and environmental accountability.

Social Media Perspectives

Recent social media posts reveal a spectrum of emotions regarding the relationship between carbon capture, ocean interactions, and climate change.

Many express urgency and a desire for immediate action, highlighting the profound impacts of climate change on weather patterns and ecosystems.

Some social media posts reflect frustration over perceived political inaction and the influence of vested interests, while a minority contest the seriousness of climate change.

Overall, there is a palpable tension between concern for the environment and skepticism about political and technological solutions.

Context

Amid rising global CO2 levels and the urgency of climate actions, advancements in carbon capture technologies and insights into oceanic CO2 absorption processes emerge as critical aspects of mitigation strategies. Previous reliance on traditional carbon reduction strategies alone has become insufficient, necessitating an expanded dialogue on innovative solutions.

Takeaway

Innovative carbon capture technologies and ocean absorption dynamics reveal critical insights for climate mitigation strategies, urging collaborative efforts for effectiveness and longevity.

Potential Outcomes

Advancements in carbon capture could lead to more effective climate mitigation strategies; probability: 70%.

Increased regulation in carbon capture may improve industry transparency and effectiveness; probability: 60%.

Failure to adequately address the 'moral hazard' associated with carbon capture technologies could undermine long-term climate goals; probability: 65%.

Deepen Your Understanding

How do new materials like COF compare with traditional carbon capture approaches?

In what ways can ocean carbon absorption be incorporated into climate policy frameworks?

Discussion:

Popular Stories

Iran launched missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar

Iran launched missiles at the U.S. base in Qatar, intercepted successfully.

June 26, 2025

US bombed key Iranian nuclear sites, sparking global tensions

US bombed Iranian nuclear sites amid escalating tensions, sparking global debate.

June 27, 2025

U.S. Senate fails to limit Trump's military actions against Iran

U.S. Senate blocks resolution limiting Trump's Iran military actions.

July 02, 2025

Balanced News:

Sort By:

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship.

Market Forecasts

Bullish / Bearish

Digital Assets / Most Accurate

Trading Strategies

Long Volatility

Short Volatility

Balanced News

Balanced News / Sources

Tech / Memes / Politics

About

About / Pricing / Forum

Contact Helium Trades

2024 © Helium Trades
Privacy Policy & Disclosure

* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.