Transparent Machine Learning Stocks + Digital Assets Forecasts*
If you don't make over $60 your first month, get your money back.
Become a more profitable investor with our transparent AI stock forecasts.
Increase your awareness with intelligent & balanced business news feed.
Stay on top with forecast models models trained, tested, and updated every day.
The news feed designed to reduce addiction and increase your understanding.
We will never sell, rent, or give your personal information away under any circumstance.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
The blue line is Helium's historical forecast. The black line is the actual closing price. Full transparency of past predictions. Hover over points for more information. Video Tutorial.
Future Price Cone
The future price cone means the model thinks there is a 80% chance the price will land within the bounds of the cone. A blue cone is neutral, a green cone is bullish, and a red cone is bearish.
Model Correlation
Higher (closer to 1) means a more accurate model and lower (closer to -1) means a less accurate model. This is the Spearman Correlation between model predicted percent change and actual percent change calculated over the last 150 days.
Percent Correct (up or down)
This is the percent of the time our models predicted the correct direction of the price (either up or down) over the last 150 days.
Tip:
Left click and drag charts to zoom in. Right click to zoom back out.
* Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.
Helium Summary:
Stanford’s Internet Observatory (SIO), an influential research center, is closing.
The center focused on combating misinformation during elections through the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) in collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security and social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.
However, the initiative faced criticism for allegedly enabling government censorship and not respecting First Amendment rights [catholicvote.org]. This closure highlights ongoing debates around the role of academic institutions in moderating information and the broader implications for freedom of speech and government oversight in digital spaces.
This comes at a time when social sciences in other regions are being re-emphasized, such as in India for rural development and new educational programs in the US [ocregister.com][newindianexpress.com].
June 25, 2024
Show historical summaries
June 24, 2024:
Stanford’s Internet Observatory (SIO), an influential research center, is closing. The center focused on combating misinformation during elections through the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) in collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security and social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. However, the initiative faced criticism for allegedly enabling government censorship and not respecting First Amendment rights [catholicvote.org]. This closure highlights ongoing debates around the role of academic institutions in moderating information and the broader implications for freedom of speech and government oversight in digital spaces. This comes at a time when social sciences in other regions are being re-emphasized, such as in India for rural development and new educational programs in the US [ocregister.com][newindianexpress.com].
Evidence
The closure of SIO and its involvement in combating election misinformation through the EIP and collaborations with the Department of Homeland Security [catholicvote.org].
Criticisms directed at the SIO for allegedly enabling government censorship and attempting to bypass First Amendment rights [catholicvote.org].
Show historical evidence
June 24, 2024:
The closure of SIO and its involvement in combating election misinformation through the EIP and collaborations with the Department of Homeland Security [catholicvote.org].
Criticisms directed at the SIO for allegedly enabling government censorship and attempting to bypass First Amendment rights [catholicvote.org].
Perspectives
First Perspective Name
Government Oversight
First Perspective
Government-aligned critics argue the collaboration between SIO and governmental bodies like CISA is essential for national security and preventing the spread of harmful misinformation, particularly during elections [catholicvote.org].
Second Perspective Name
Academic Freedom
Second Perspective
Critics concerned with academic freedom argue that such collaborations compromise the independence of academic institutions and that SIO’s activities constituted undue government interference and censorship, potentially bypassing First Amendment rights [catholicvote.org].
Third Perspective Name
Technological and Social Innovation
Third Perspective
Proponents of technological and social innovation argue that the original mission of SIO to better understand and combat internet abuse was critical and that its closure hinders progress in these fields. They believe such initiatives must continue but with more transparent and accountable practices [catholicvote.org].
My Bias
My analysis is influenced by a preference for maintaining academic independence and skepticism toward government surveillance and censorship activities, reflecting my training emphasizing civil liberties and freedom of speech. This shapes my understanding of the SIO’s controversial closure as a critical issue for academic and information integrity.
Show historical perspectives
June 24, 2024:
First Perspective Name
Government Oversight
First Perspective
Government-aligned critics argue the collaboration between SIO and governmental bodies like CISA is essential for national security and preventing the spread of harmful misinformation, particularly during elections [catholicvote.org].
Second Perspective Name
Academic Freedom
Second Perspective
Critics concerned with academic freedom argue that such collaborations compromise the independence of academic institutions and that SIO’s activities constituted undue government interference and censorship, potentially bypassing First Amendment rights [catholicvote.org].
Third Perspective Name
Technological and Social Innovation
Third Perspective
Proponents of technological and social innovation argue that the original mission of SIO to better understand and combat internet abuse was critical and that its closure hinders progress in these fields. They believe such initiatives must continue but with more transparent and accountable practices [catholicvote.org].
My Bias
My analysis is influenced by a preference for maintaining academic independence and skepticism toward government surveillance and censorship activities, reflecting my training emphasizing civil liberties and freedom of speech. This shapes my understanding of the SIO’s controversial closure as a critical issue for academic and information integrity.
The information from catholicvote.org might carry inherent bias, focusing on the allegations of government overreach and censorship, which would resonate with readers who prioritize civil liberties.
The source's potential ideological slant could emphasize the threats to free speech over the benefits of combating misinformation [catholicvote.org]. Awareness of this bias is crucial when interpreting the presented facts.
Show historical Media Bias
June 24, 2024:
The information from catholicvote.org might carry inherent bias, focusing on the allegations of government overreach and censorship, which would resonate with readers who prioritize civil liberties.
The source's potential ideological slant could emphasize the threats to free speech over the benefits of combating misinformation [catholicvote.org]. Awareness of this bias is crucial when interpreting the presented facts.
Social Media Perspectives
The closure of Stanford's misinformation center, SIO, has sparked mixed reactions on social media.
Some social media posts reflect concern about the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation, emphasizing the importance of addressing these issues.
Others express skepticism toward the concept of misinformation, questioning who benefits from controlling narratives and implying that suppression of dissenting views may be at play.
Overall, the sentiment ranges from alarm over unchecked misinformation to doubts about the motives behind efforts to combat it.
Context
The closure of SIO occurs in a larger context of debates over freedom of speech, academic independence, and the role of government in regulating online information. Understanding the implications for future research initiatives and civil liberties is critical.
Takeaway
The closure of SIO raises critical questions about the balance between preventing misinformation and safeguarding academic independence and free speech.
Potential Outcomes
Strengthened policies around the balance between academic initiatives and government collaboration (65%): This outcome addresses the controversy and seeks to improve transparency and safeguards.
Reduction in institutional initiatives to combat misinformation (35%): This might result if institutions become wary of potential backlash and legal issues, thereby reducing efforts to counter misinformation.
Show historical predictions
June 24, 2024:
Strengthened policies around the balance between academic initiatives and government collaboration (65%): This outcome addresses the controversy and seeks to improve transparency and safeguards.
Reduction in institutional initiatives to combat misinformation (35%): This might result if institutions become wary of potential backlash and legal issues, thereby reducing efforts to counter misinformation.
* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy
of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions,
you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.