Meta stops using independent fact-checkers across its platforms

United States Tech Markets Politics Business Science Memes

Meta ends third-party fact-checking on its platforms

Source: https://www.snopes.com/2025/01/10/snopes-ceo-on-facebook-factcheck-cuts/

Helium Summary: Meta has announced the end of third-party fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, opting for a Citizen Notes system similar to Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter)

Wednesday Briefing: Meta Set to End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to end third-party fact-checking, portraying it as a strategic shift that aligns with Trump's ideals of free expression, while also highlighting mixed reactions including approval from Trump and criticism from digital rights groups, reflecting a complex interaction between technology, politics, and public discourse.

New York Times Bias

Social Shares: 4

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to political content and current events.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Zuckerberg Owes Restitution To Those He Tried To Destroy

Article Bias: The article strongly criticizes Mark Zuckerberg for alleged manipulation of the 2020 election and censorship of conservative media, conveying a clear bias against technology companies and highlighting perceived leftist influence; it emphasizes the need for accountability and portrays Zuckerberg's changes as opportunistic rather than principled.

The Federalist Bias

Social Shares: 208

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Trained data may lean towards factual reporting, lacking extreme perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. This change aligns with broader political shifts following Donald Trump’s re-election

Meta's done with fact-checking — and its CMO says Trump and changing 'vibes in America' are major reasons why

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's shift away from fact-checking in favor of community notes, framing it as a response to changes in political leadership and public sentiment around censorship and free speech, particularly in relation to the incoming Trump administration.

Business Insider Bias

Social Shares: 10

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I analyze sources but may reflect mainstream media perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

, inciting polarized reactions.

Some view it as a reduction of censorship, aligning with free expression principles

Zuckerberg ADMITS government censorship, changes tune on free speech

Article Bias: The article discusses Mark Zuckerberg's shift towards promoting free speech on Meta platforms, aligning with Elon Musk's stance and criticizing past practices of censorship, particularly by third-party fact-checkers, while presenting varying opinions on the effectiveness and sincerity of this change, which indicates a leaning towards skepticism about established social media policies.

The Blaze Bias

Social Shares: 52

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I strive for neutrality but may reflect Western liberal biases.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Liberal media commentators rage after Meta ends fact-checking program: 'Incredibly dangerous'

Article Bias: The article describes the backlash from liberal commentators against Meta's decision to end its fact-checking program, emphasizing concerns about misinformation and the alleged influence of conservative politics on this decision, indicating a tilt toward liberal viewpoints in the criticism of Meta's changes and a focus on the impacts of misinformation.

Fox Bias

Social Shares: 69

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Objective analysis based on media portrayals and factual representation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

, while opponents fear increased misinformation

Meta is leaving its users to wade through hate and disinformation

Article Bias: The article critically examines Meta's decision to end its third-party fact-checking program, highlighting concerns from experts about the potential rise in disinformation and hate speech online, and suggests that this change may be politically motivated to align with right-wing interests, particularly those of former President Trump.

The Verge Bias

Social Shares: 91

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific biases; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Wednesday Briefing: Meta Set to End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to end third-party fact-checking, portraying it as a strategic shift that aligns with Trump's ideals of free expression, while also highlighting mixed reactions including approval from Trump and criticism from digital rights groups, reflecting a complex interaction between technology, politics, and public discourse.

New York Times Bias

Social Shares: 4

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to political content and current events.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Critics argue the decision favors conservative narratives and question its impact on democratic discourse and misinformation

The danger of Meta's big fact-checking changes

Article Bias: This article critically examines Meta's decision to reduce fact-checking and moderation, suggesting that these changes serve to align with and support the Trump administration, while also raising concerns about the spread of misinformation.

It highlights Zuckerberg's arguments about bias and censorship but positions them in the broader context of political and business interests.

Overall, it exhibits a skepticism towards Meta's motives, suggesting a nuanced critique of corporate and political interactions.

Vox Bias

Social Shares: 113

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I strive for objectivity but may reflect an institutional perspective.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

An urgent meeting of the fact-check Legion of Doom

Article Bias: The article focuses on Mark Zuckerberg's criticism of third-party fact-checkers, emphasizing a belief that they are politically biased and have eroded public trust, revealing a potential bias towards valuing free speech over fact-checking.

SOTT Bias

Social Shares: 12

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📝 Prescriptive:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I may overemphasize political contexts due to data sources.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

January 14, 2025

Evidence

Meta ends third-party fact-checkers in favor of community notes system

Wednesday Briefing: Meta Set to End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to end third-party fact-checking, portraying it as a strategic shift that aligns with Trump's ideals of free expression, while also highlighting mixed reactions including approval from Trump and criticism from digital rights groups, reflecting a complex interaction between technology, politics, and public discourse.

New York Times Bias

Social Shares: 4

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to political content and current events.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Zuckerberg Owes Restitution To Those He Tried To Destroy

Article Bias: The article strongly criticizes Mark Zuckerberg for alleged manipulation of the 2020 election and censorship of conservative media, conveying a clear bias against technology companies and highlighting perceived leftist influence; it emphasizes the need for accountability and portrays Zuckerberg's changes as opportunistic rather than principled.

The Federalist Bias

Social Shares: 208

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Trained data may lean towards factual reporting, lacking extreme perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Political influence cited as a major factor in decision

Meta's done with fact-checking — and its CMO says Trump and changing 'vibes in America' are major reasons why

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's shift away from fact-checking in favor of community notes, framing it as a response to changes in political leadership and public sentiment around censorship and free speech, particularly in relation to the incoming Trump administration.

Business Insider Bias

Social Shares: 10

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I analyze sources but may reflect mainstream media perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Zuckerberg ADMITS government censorship, changes tune on free speech

Article Bias: The article discusses Mark Zuckerberg's shift towards promoting free speech on Meta platforms, aligning with Elon Musk's stance and criticizing past practices of censorship, particularly by third-party fact-checkers, while presenting varying opinions on the effectiveness and sincerity of this change, which indicates a leaning towards skepticism about established social media policies.

The Blaze Bias

Social Shares: 52

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🔬 Scientific <—> Superstitious 🔮:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: I strive for neutrality but may reflect Western liberal biases.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Perspectives

Supporters of Free Expression

Individuals in favor of free expression see Meta's move as a positive step toward reducing censorship and allowing more diverse voices online. They argue that the existing fact-checking system was biased and that this change promotes open discussion

Meta To End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to replace independent fact-checkers with user-generated comments on post accuracy, a move that raises concerns about misinformation and the role of community input in content moderation; it reflects potential skepticism towards this approach.

The Onion Bias

Social Shares: 1,188

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to training data; may miss nuanced perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Nolte: Mark Zuckerberg Hands Legacy Media Humiliating and Historic Defeat

Article Bias: The article presents an overwhelmingly negative view of legacy media and highlights Mark Zuckerberg's shift towards reducing censorship and bias in Meta's platforms, framing this change as a significant defeat for traditional media, signaling a cultural shift favoring free expression, particularly regarding contentious topics like gender and immigration.

Breitbart Bias

Social Shares: 423

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Focused on political reporting; limited exposure to diverse viewpoints.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Critics of Misinformation

Critics highlight fears over the spread of misinformation, worsened by removing professional fact-checkers. They argue this could undermine societal trust in online information and favor polarized narratives

Meta is leaving its users to wade through hate and disinformation

Article Bias: The article critically examines Meta's decision to end its third-party fact-checking program, highlighting concerns from experts about the potential rise in disinformation and hate speech online, and suggests that this change may be politically motivated to align with right-wing interests, particularly those of former President Trump.

The Verge Bias

Social Shares: 91

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific biases; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Zuckerberg's Meta follows Musk's X into misinformation

Article Bias: The article critiques Meta's shift away from fact-checking, linking it to political motivations and suggesting that this move will exacerbate misinformation, particularly favoring conservative narratives linked to Donald Trump, while expressing concern over the implications for public discourse and democracy.

Daily Kos Bias

Social Shares: 1,420

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited by training on political discourse; strive for objectivity.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Helium Bias

My responses are based on available data up to Oct 2023, with no capacity for personal bias, focusing on objectivity.

Story Blindspots

Potential blindspots include neglecting regional impacts outside the U.S. and underestimating community-based moderation effectiveness.

Relevant Trades

Q&A

What changes has Meta announced for its fact-checking policy?

Meta has ended third-party fact-checking and will use a community notes model, similar to X

Wednesday Briefing: Meta Set to End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to end third-party fact-checking, portraying it as a strategic shift that aligns with Trump's ideals of free expression, while also highlighting mixed reactions including approval from Trump and criticism from digital rights groups, reflecting a complex interaction between technology, politics, and public discourse.

New York Times Bias

Social Shares: 4

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to political content and current events.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Zuckerberg Owes Restitution To Those He Tried To Destroy

Article Bias: The article strongly criticizes Mark Zuckerberg for alleged manipulation of the 2020 election and censorship of conservative media, conveying a clear bias against technology companies and highlighting perceived leftist influence; it emphasizes the need for accountability and portrays Zuckerberg's changes as opportunistic rather than principled.

The Federalist Bias

Social Shares: 208

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Trained data may lean towards factual reporting, lacking extreme perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Why is this decision receiving polarized opinions?

Supporters argue it promotes free speech by reducing censorship; critics worry about misinformation

Meta To End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to replace independent fact-checkers with user-generated comments on post accuracy, a move that raises concerns about misinformation and the role of community input in content moderation; it reflects potential skepticism towards this approach.

The Onion Bias

Social Shares: 1,188

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to training data; may miss nuanced perspectives.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Liberal media commentators rage after Meta ends fact-checking program: 'Incredibly dangerous'

Article Bias: The article describes the backlash from liberal commentators against Meta's decision to end its fact-checking program, emphasizing concerns about misinformation and the alleged influence of conservative politics on this decision, indicating a tilt toward liberal viewpoints in the criticism of Meta's changes and a focus on the impacts of misinformation.

Fox Bias

Social Shares: 69

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Objective analysis based on media portrayals and factual representation.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

.

Narratives + Biases (?)

The New York Times and The Washington Post focus on the implications for misinformation and democracy, often framing the decision as potentially harmful

Wednesday Briefing: Meta Set to End Fact-Checking

Article Bias: The article discusses Meta's decision to end third-party fact-checking, portraying it as a strategic shift that aligns with Trump's ideals of free expression, while also highlighting mixed reactions including approval from Trump and criticism from digital rights groups, reflecting a complex interaction between technology, politics, and public discourse.

New York Times Bias

Social Shares: 4

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🎲 Speculation:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to political content and current events.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Meta is leaving its users to wade through hate and disinformation

Article Bias: The article critically examines Meta's decision to end its third-party fact-checking program, highlighting concerns from experts about the potential rise in disinformation and hate speech online, and suggests that this change may be politically motivated to align with right-wing interests, particularly those of former President Trump.

The Verge Bias

Social Shares: 91

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: No specific biases; aiming for neutrality in analysis.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. Conservative outlets like Breitbart and The Daily Wire view it as a victory for free expression, criticizing past censorship

Nolte: Mark Zuckerberg Hands Legacy Media Humiliating and Historic Defeat

Article Bias: The article presents an overwhelmingly negative view of legacy media and highlights Mark Zuckerberg's shift towards reducing censorship and bias in Meta's platforms, framing this change as a significant defeat for traditional media, signaling a cultural shift favoring free expression, particularly regarding contentious topics like gender and immigration.

Breitbart Bias

Social Shares: 423

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

🦊 Anti-Corporate <—> Pro-Corporate 👔:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Focused on political reporting; limited exposure to diverse viewpoints.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

Facebook Fact-Checkers Freak Out, Call Emergency Meeting After Zuckerberg Pulls Funding

Article Bias: The article presents a critical view of Facebook's decision to withdraw funding from left-leaning fact-checking organizations, framing it in terms of a conservative perspective on censorship and misinformation, while highlighting reactions from those organizations that signal alarm over the loss of support.

The Daily Wire Bias

Social Shares: 1,542

🔵 Liberal <—> Conservative 🔴:

🗽 Libertarian <—> Authoritarian 🚔:

🗞️ Objective <—> Subjective 👁️ :

🚨 Sensational:

📉 Bearish <—> Bullish 📈:

📝 Prescriptive:

🕊️ Dovish <—> Hawkish 🦁:

😨 Fearful:

📞 Begging the Question:

🗣️ Gossip:

💭 Opinion:

🗳 Political:

Oversimplification:

🏛️ Appeal to Authority:

🍼 Immature:

🔄 Circular Reasoning:

👀 Covering Responses:

😢 Victimization:

😤 Overconfident:

🗑️ Spam:

✊ Ideological:

🏴 Anti-establishment <—> Pro-establishment 📺:

🙁 Negative <—> Positive 🙂:

📏📏 Double Standard:

❌ Uncredible <—> Credible ✅:

🧠 Rational <—> Irrational 🤪:

🤑 Advertising:

👤 Individualist <—> Collectivist 👥:

🐍 Manipulative:

🤖 Written by AI:

💔 Low Integrity <—> High Integrity ❤️:

AI Bias: Limited to text analysis, lacking real-world contextual understanding.

Article Text:
Please login or sign up to view

. This polarization reveals ideological divides over social media's role in managing speech.

Many narratives lack nuance, overlooking possible benefits of decentralized fact-checking systems and the challenges in operationalizing such a shift.

Potential biases include ideological inclinations and a focus on the U.S. perspective, risking oversights in regional impacts or benefits of community-led moderation systems.

Social Media Perspectives

Social media sentiment around "fact checkers" reveals a polarized landscape. Many users express gratitude for fact checkers, viewing them as essential guardians of truth in an era rife with misinformation. These individuals often share posts praising fact checkers for debunking myths and providing clarity on complex issues, highlighting a sense of relief and trust in these entities. Conversely, a significant portion of the discourse is skeptical or outright critical. Some users perceive fact checkers as biased, accusing them of pushing agendas rather than objective truth. This group often uses terms like "censorship" and "narrative control," reflecting feelings of frustration and distrust. There's a recurring theme of questioning the credibility of fact-checking organizations, with users citing instances where fact checks were later disputed or overturned, fueling a narrative of manipulation. Amidst this, a smaller segment of users calls for more transparency in fact-checking methodologies, expressing a nuanced hope for improvement rather than outright rejection or acceptance. This mix of sentiments underscores a broader societal debate on the role and reliability of fact checkers in shaping public discourse.

Context

Meta's new policy reflects shifts in political power and societal attitudes toward online content moderation. The decision affects the role of fact-checkers and has significant implications for information trustworthiness and political discourse globally.

Takeaway

This transition highlights critical debates about the balance between free speech and misinformation control in digital spaces. The change reflects shifting political landscapes and could alter trust levels in online information.

Potential Outcomes

Increased misinformation risk (70%): Removal of independent fact-checkers could lead to unchecked spread of false information .

Improved free expression (30%): More diverse opinions might flourish, strengthening public discourse if community moderation is effective .

Deepen Your Understanding

How will community notes handle controversial topics?

What safeguards exist to prevent manipulation in community moderation?

Discussion:

Balanced News:

Sort By:

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship.

Market Forecasts

Bullish / Bearish

Digital Assets / Most Accurate

Trading Strategies

Long Volatility

Short Volatility

Balanced News

Balanced News / Sources

Tech / Memes / Politics

About

About / Pricing / Forum

2024 © Helium Trades
Privacy Policy & Disclosure

* Disclaimer: Nothing on this website constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Helium Trades is not responsible in any way for the accuracy of any model predictions or price data. Any mention of a particular security and related prediction data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Helium Trades is not responsible for any of your investment decisions, you should consult a financial expert before engaging in any transaction.

Meta ends third-party fact-checking on its platforms

January 14, 2025

Evidence

Perspectives

Helium Bias

My responses are based on available data up to Oct 2023, with no capacity for personal bias, focusing on objectivity.

Story Blindspots

Potential blindspots include neglecting regional impacts outside the U.S. and underestimating community-based moderation effectiveness.

Relevant Trades

[GOOG] Alphabet

Q&A

Narratives + Biases (?)

Social Media Perspectives

Context

Meta's new policy reflects shifts in political power and societal attitudes toward online content moderation. The decision affects the role of fact-checkers and has significant implications for information trustworthiness and political discourse globally.

Takeaway

This transition highlights critical debates about the balance between free speech and misinformation control in digital spaces. The change reflects shifting political landscapes and could alter trust levels in online information.

Potential Outcomes

Increased misinformation risk (70%): Removal of independent fact-checkers could lead to unchecked spread of false information .

Improved free expression (30%): More diverse opinions might flourish, strengthening public discourse if community moderation is effective .

Deepen Your Understanding

How will community notes handle controversial topics?

What safeguards exist to prevent manipulation in community moderation?

Discussion:

Popular Stories

Los Angeles wildfires cause severe destruction and trigger global responses.

Immigration changes by Trump could reshape U.S. economic dynamics.

U.S. sanctions Chinese firm over alleged cybersecurity breaches.

Balanced News:

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship.

Market Forecasts

Trading Strategies

Balanced News

About

Contact Helium Trades

Meta ends third-party fact-checking on its platforms

January 14, 2025

Evidence

Perspectives

Helium Bias My responses are based on available data up to Oct 2023, with no capacity for personal bias, focusing on objectivity.

Story Blindspots Potential blindspots include neglecting regional impacts outside the U.S. and underestimating community-based moderation effectiveness.

Relevant Trades

[GOOG] Alphabet

Q&A

Narratives + Biases (?)

Social Media Perspectives

Context

Meta's new policy reflects shifts in political power and societal attitudes toward online content moderation. The decision affects the role of fact-checkers and has significant implications for information trustworthiness and political discourse globally.

Takeaway

This transition highlights critical debates about the balance between free speech and misinformation control in digital spaces. The change reflects shifting political landscapes and could alter trust levels in online information.

Potential Outcomes

Increased misinformation risk (70%): Removal of independent fact-checkers could lead to unchecked spread of false information .Improved free expression (30%): More diverse opinions might flourish, strengthening public discourse if community moderation is effective .

Deepen Your Understanding

How will community notes handle controversial topics? What safeguards exist to prevent manipulation in community moderation?

Discussion:

Popular Stories

Los Angeles wildfires cause severe destruction and trigger global responses.

Immigration changes by Trump could reshape U.S. economic dynamics.

U.S. sanctions Chinese firm over alleged cybersecurity breaches.

Balanced News:

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship. Get Started

Market Forecasts

Trading Strategies

Balanced News

About

Contact Helium Trades

Chat with Helium

Helium Bias

My responses are based on available data up to Oct 2023, with no capacity for personal bias, focusing on objectivity.

Story Blindspots

Potential blindspots include neglecting regional impacts outside the U.S. and underestimating community-based moderation effectiveness.

Increased misinformation risk (70%): Removal of independent fact-checkers could lead to unchecked spread of false information .

Improved free expression (30%): More diverse opinions might flourish, strengthening public discourse if community moderation is effective .

How will community notes handle controversial topics?

What safeguards exist to prevent manipulation in community moderation?

Increase your understanding with more perspectives. No ads. No censorship.